Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30255774›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2018

Data mining and machine learning approaches for the integration of genome-wide association and methylation data: methodology and main conclusions from GAW20.

Burcu Darst, Corinne D Engelman, Ye Tian, Justo Lorenzo Bermejo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Burcu DarstDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 610 Walnut St. 1007 WARF, Madison, WI, 53726, USA.
Corinne D EngelmanDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 610 Walnut St. 1007 WARF, Madison, WI, 53726, USA.
Ye TianDepartment of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, 745 Bannatyne Ave, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 0J9, Canada.
Justo Lorenzo BermejoInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. lorenzo@imbi.uni-heidelberg.de.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

Research Training for Computation and Informatics in Biology and MedicineT15LM007359 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Mark W. Craven, Colin Noel Dewey · 2002 to 2026
$22.6M
Statistical Data Enclave CoreP30AG017266 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Michal Engelman · 1999 to 2026
$17.0M
Genetic and Environmental Determinants of TriglyceridesU01HL072524 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI ARNETT, DONNA K · 2002 to 2008
$11.9M
GENETIC ANALYSIS OF COMMON DISEASES: AN EVALUATIONR01GM031575 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY · PI ALMASY, LAURA A. · 1985 to 2016
$7.8M
Genomewide Association Study of Lipid Response to Fenofibrate and Dietary FatR01HL091357 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI ARNETT, DONNA K · 2008 to 2018
$5.8M
Epigenetic Determinants of Lipid Response to Dietary Fat and FenofibrateR01HL104135 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI ARNETT, DONNA K · 2010 to 2015
$5.5M
Genomic and Metabolomic Data Integration in a Longitudinal Cohort at Risk for Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG054047 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ENGELMAN, CORINNE D. · 2016 to 2020
$3.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL091357NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL104135NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL072524NIA NIH HHS P30 AG017266NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054047NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM031575NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple layers of genetic and epigenetic variability are being simultaneously explored in an increasing number of health studies. We summarize here different approaches applied in the Data Mining and Machine Learning group at the GAW20 to integrate genome-wide genotype and methylation array data.

resultsWe provide a non-intimidating introduction to some frequently used methods to investigate high-dimensional molecular data and compare the different approaches tried by group members: random forest, deep learning, cluster analysis, mixed models, and gene-set enrichment analysis. Group contributions were quite heterogeneous regarding investigated data sets (real vs simulated), conducted data quality control and assessed phenotypes (eg, metabolic syndrome vs relative differences of log-transformed triglyceride concentrations before and after fenofibrate treatment). However, some common technical issues were detected, leading to practical recommendations.

conclusionsDifferent sources of correlation were identified by group members, including population stratification, family structure, batch effects, linkage disequilibrium and correlation of methylation values at neighboring cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) sites, and the majority of applied approaches were able to take into account identified correlation structures. The ability to efficiently deal with high-dimensional omics data, and the model free nature of the approaches that did not require detailed model specifications were clearly recognized as the main strengths of applied methods. A limitation of random forest is its sensitivity to highly correlated variables. The parameter setup and the interpretation of results from deep learning methods, in particular deep neural networks, can be extremely challenging. Cluster analysis and mixed models may need some predimension reduction based on existing literature, data filtering, and supplementary statistical methods, and gene-set enrichment analysis requires biological insight.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyMachine LearningCluster AnalysisCpG IslandsData MiningDNA MethylationHumansPhenotypeData miningEpigenome-wide association studyGenome-wide association studyMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID30255774
PMCPMC6157271
OpenAlexW2891083911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.