ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2018
Prognostic Value of Lymphangiogenesis Determinants in Luminal and Non-luminal Breast Carcinomas
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Omega-3 Supplementation on Ki-67 and VEGF Expression Levels and Clinical Outcomes of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant CAF Chemotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial ReportAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2019Trial
- Histogram analysis comparison of readout-segmented and single-shot echo-planar imaging for differentiating luminal from non-luminal breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Diagnostic implications of lncRNA NORAD in breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Identifying glycolysis-related LncRNAs for predicting prognosis in breast cancer patients.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2022Article
- Ultrasonographic Algorithm for the Assessment of Sentinel Lymph Nodes That Drain the Mammary Carcinomas in Female Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast carcinomas (BCs) are sub-classified according to the molecular characteristics into luminal and non-luminal subtypes that clinically show different biological behavior, treatment and prognosis. BCs spread primarily through lymphatic vessels using cascade processes of lymphagiogenesis in which VEGF-C plays an important role during lymph node metastasis. Prognostic value of VEGF-C in luminal and non-luminal BC is still unclear and has not been studied thoroughly to clarify and define prognosis and therapeutic monitoring. Aim: To define the prognostic value of lymphangiogenesis on survival rates of luminal and non-luminal subtypes BC. Materials and Methods: This study applied prospective cohort design, using 130 patients of invasive duct carcinoma of the breast, stage I-IIIA, from Sardjito General Hospital, Indonesia and subsequent longitudinal follow-up. Immunohistochemical staining was carried out using anti-ER, -PR, -Her-2, VEGF-C, VEGFR-3 and D2-40 antibodies. The related clinicopathologic characteristics of BC patients and lymphangiogenesis determinants, including VEGF-C expression, were statistically analyzed. Results: In non-luminal BC subtypes, VEGF-C expression (HR=0.04; 95% CI=0.01-0.41), lymph node metastasis (HR=0.14; 95% CI=0.04-0.55) and stage (HR=0.30; 95% CI= 0.02-0.76) were determined as independent prognostic factors on survival rates. However, the lymphangiogenesis determinants were not associated with the survival rates of luminal BC subtypes. Conclusion: This study suggested that lymphangiogenesis affects survival rates of non-Luminal subtype rather than the luminal subtypes of BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.