Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30255690›Full record

ReviewAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2018

Dysregulation of Glucose Metabolism by Oncogenes and Tumor Suppressors in Cancer Cells

Casterland Marbaniang, Lakhan Kma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Phytochemicals Target Multiple Metabolic Pathways in Cancer.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Casterland MarbaniangDepartment of Biochemistry, Cancer and Radiation Countermeasures Unit,North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, Meghalaya, India. Email: lakhonkma@gmail.com
Lakhan Kma
North Eastern Hill University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancers are complex diseases having several unique features, commonly described as ‘hallmarks of cancer’. Among them, altered signaling pathways are the common characteristic features that drive cancer progression; this is achieved due to mutations that lead to the activation of growth promoting(s) oncogenes and inactivation of tumor suppressors. As a result of which, cancer cells increase their glycolytic rate by consuming a large amount of glucose, and convert a majority of glucose to lactate even in the presence of oxygen known as the “Warburg effect”. Tumor cells like other cells are strictly dependent on energy for growth and survival; therefore, understanding energy metabolism will give us an idea to develop new effective anti-cancer therapies that target cancer energy production pathways. This review summarizes the roles of tumor suppressors and oncogenes and their products that provide metabolic advantages to cancer cells which in turn leads to the establishment of the “Warburg effect” and ultimately leads to cancer progression. Understanding cancer cell’s vulnerability will provide potential targets for its control.

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismGenes, Tumor SuppressorGlucoseHumansNeoplasmsOncogenesGlucoseAMPKc-MycGlycolysisHIF-1αp53

Identifiers

PMID30255690
PMCPMC6249467
OpenAlexW2890701679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.