Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30255429›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2019

Update on laboratory diagnosis of amoebiasis.

Syazwan Saidin, Nurulhasanah Othman, Rahmah Noordin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections for six years (2015-2020) in Thi-Qar Province, Iraq.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2025
    Article
  6. Evaluation of Each ThreeMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Prevalence ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Molecular identification ofVeterinary world · 2024
    Article
  19. Amebic liver abscess: An update.World journal of hepatology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Syazwan SaidinInstitute for Research in Molecular Medicine, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Penang, Malaysia.
Nurulhasanah OthmanInstitute for Research in Molecular Medicine, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Penang, Malaysia.
Rahmah NoordinInstitute for Research in Molecular Medicine, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Penang, Malaysia. rahmah8485@gmail.com.
Universiti Sains Malaysia · MY

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia 311/CIPPM/4401005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amoebiasis, an enteric protozoan disease caused by Entamoeba histolytica, is a public health problem in many developing countries, causing up to 100,000 fatal cases annually. Detection of the pathogenic E. histolytica and its differentiation from the non-pathogenic Entamoeba spp. play a crucial role in the clinical management of patients. Laboratory diagnosis of intestinal amoebiasis in developing countries still relies on labour-intensive and insensitive methods involving staining of stool sample and microscopy. Newer and more sensitive methods include a variety of antigen detection ELISAs and rapid tests; however, their diagnostic sensitivity and specificity seem to vary between studies, and some tests do not distinguish among the Entamoeba species. Molecular detection techniques are highly sensitive and specific and isothermal amplification approaches may be developed into field-applicable tests; however, cost is still a barrier for their use as a routine laboratory test method in most endemic areas. Laboratory diagnosis of extraintestinal amoebiasis faces challenges of lack of definitive detection of current infection and commercially available point-of-care tests. For both types of amoebiasis, there is still a need for highly sensitive and specific tests that are rapid and cost-effective for use in developing countries where the disease is prevalent. In recent years, new molecules of diagnostic value are being discovered and new tests developed. The advances in 'omics' technologies are enabling discoveries of new biomarkers that may help distinguish between different infection stages.

Indexed as

Dysentery, AmebicEntamoeba histolyticaMicrobiological TechniquesMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionAmoebiasisDiagnosisEntamoeba disparEntamoeba histolyticaLaboratory

Identifiers

PMID30255429
OpenAlexW2894217210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.