ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2019
Measuring the Effects of Education in Detecting Lung Cancer on Chest Radiographs: Utilization of a New Assessment Tool.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of chest radiographs in early lung cancer detection.Translational lung cancer research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was designed to evaluate the effect of group and individualized educational lectures to accurately interpret chest radiographs of lung cancer patients and to introduce a new educational tool in evaluating skills for reading chest radiographs. Utilizing "hotspot" technology will be instrumental in measuring the effect of education in interpreting chest radiographs. There were 48 participants in the study. Chest radiographs of 100 lung cancer patients and 11 healthy patients taken at various time points were used for evaluation. Using "hotspot" technology, lesions on each radiograph were outlined. Values were taken at baseline, after which the group received lectures. Several days later, they underwent exam 2. Exam 3 was conducted after individualized lectures. A final exam was taken after the participants underwent individualized training within 2 months. Scores significantly improved after the individual lessons (p < 0.001). This improvement in performance decreased in the final examination. Statistically significant differences were observed between exam 2 vs. exam 3 and exam 3 vs. the final exam (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). Participants demonstrated more improvement in detecting lesions in abnormal chest radiographs than in identifying normal ones. Although there was significant improvement in detecting abnormal radiographs by the end of the study (p < 0.001), no improvement was observed in detecting normal ones. We measured lung cancer detection rate using a new "hotspot" detection tool for chest radiographs. With the proposed scoring system, this tool could be objectively used in evaluating the educational effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.