ReviewNeurosurgical review2019
The re-anastomosis end-to-end bypass technique: a comprehensive review of the technical characteristics and surgical experience.
Review in Neurosurgical review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Re-anastomosis end-to-end bypass is a straightforward subtype of intracranial-intracranial reconstruction technique that has been utilized to treat complex aneurysms and skull base tumors. This simple technique involves connecting the cut ends of an afferent and efferent artery under added tension after excising the lesion. The current study aims to provide a detailed description of the technical pitfalls, ideal anatomical sites and indications, and clinical outcomes for intracranial complex disorders. A literature search was performed using the terms "intracranial-intracranial bypass," "re-anastomosis bypass," "reconstructive bypass," "end-to-end bypass," and "end-to-end anastomosis" to identify pertinent articles. Articles involving end-to-end re-anastomosis combined with other bypass methods were excluded. Computer-tablet-drawn illustrations of this technique are provided to enhance comprehension. Eighty-six patients who met our search and inclusion criteria were identified between 1978 and the present. However, comprehensive descriptions of medical records and neuroimaging were available in only 41 cases (40 complex aneurysms and a skull base tumor). Of 40 reported cases of complex cerebral aneurysms treated by this technique, the overall rate of full recovery without complication is 87.5% (35/40). Meanwhile, all aneurysms were completely eliminated from the circulation, with 92.5% of bypasses being patent. End-to-end re-anastomosis remains a simple modality in the microsurgical bypass armamentarium. Safe and effective surgical outcomes can be achieved in select cases that rarely involve perforators or branches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.