ArticleIrish journal of medical science2019
An audit of healthcare professionals' knowledge regarding perinatal autopsy.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimally invasive autopsy - endoscopic approach to post-mortem diagnostics.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024Review
- Perinatal autopsy in Ghana: Healthcare workers knowledge and attitude.Frontiers in global women's health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerinatal autopsy is one the most valuable investigations to ascertain the cause of death (Nijkamp et al., Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 22:167-175, 2017; Korteweg et al., AJOG 53, e1-12, 2012; Late Interuterine Death and Stillbirth' RCOG Green-top Guideline No.55, 2015). Discussions about perinatal autopsy can be difficult for parents and healthcare professionals. Perinatal staff need a good level of knowledge and understanding regarding perinatal autopsy in order to discuss the procedure with parents. This study aims to investigate healthcare professionals' knowledge regarding perinatal autopsy.
methodsAn audit conducted in a large teaching hospital using a questionnaire was developed and distributed to healthcare professionals in the hospital.
resultsSeventy healthcare professionals participated in the audit. Of those surveyed, 64% (n = 45) have discussed perinatal autopsy with a mother and the majority of healthcare professionals (67%) found this difficult. Self-reported levels of understanding were found to be low with just 10% reporting 'excellent understanding'.
conclusionsThe results of this audit highlight the need for further education among all healthcare professionals working with bereaved families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30255372What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.