Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30255364›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical research2018

Targeted Ocular Drug Delivery with Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Considerations.

Jie Shen, Guang Wei Lu, Patrick Hughes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Experimental and mathematical approaches for drug delivery for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jie ShenClinical Pharmacology, Nonclinical and Translational Sciences, Allergan, Plc, 2525 Dupont Drive, Irvine, California, 92612, USA. shen_jie@allergan.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2779-079X
Guang Wei LuOphthalmic Product Development, TWi Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Taipei, China.
Patrick HughesApplied Research, Glaukos Corp, San Clemente, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of ophthalmic drug delivery systems is a long and comprehensive process including research, nonclinical, and clinical development stages. It is critical to understand the similarity and differences between animal models and patients. There are many anatomically and physiologically important parameters for targeted drug delivery into eyes. This paper reviews the constraints to various routes of ocular drug delivery and discusses the respective pharmacokinetic considerations, to lay the foundation for formulation approaches pharmaceutical scientists can use to maximize successful drug delivery for each route. The overall goal is to give both researchers and drug developers a better understanding of ocular drug delivery and offer tools to successfully develop new medicines that will fulfil unmet medical needs and improve patients' quality of life.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAdministration, OphthalmicAnimalsDelayed-Action PreparationsEyeEye DiseasesHumansOphthalmic SolutionsPharmaceutical PreparationsDelayed-Action PreparationsOphthalmic SolutionsPharmaceutical Preparationsformulationocularpharmacodynamicpharmacokineticsustained releasetargeted delivery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.