Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30255358›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2018

[Histopathological classification principles of rheumatic joint diseases : Contribution of pathology to the diagnosis].

V Krenn, W Waldstein, A Najm, G Perino, R Gaulke

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Mesenchymal stromal cells for osteonecrosis.Journal of translational medicine · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

V KrennMVZ-Zentrum für Histologie, Zytologie und Molekulare Diagnostik GmbH, Max-Planck-Str. 5, Trier, Deutschland. krenn@patho-trier.de.
W WaldsteinAKH-Wien, Universitätsklinik für Orthopädie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich.
A NajmRheumatology Department, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, Frankreich.
G PerinoHospital for Special Surgery, HSS, New York City, NY, USA.
R GaulkeUnfallchirurgische Klinik, Sektion obere Extremität, Fuß- und Rheumachirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.
Hospital for Special Surgery · USMedical University of Vienna · ATMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DENantes Université · FRZentrum für Pathologie und Zytodiagnostik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even though the diagnostics of rheumatic joint diseases are mostly based on clinical, immunoserological and imaging criteria, histopathology can also make a significant contribution. This is particularly true for clinically unclear monoarticular and periarticular diseases. The contribution of histopathology to the diagnosis of rheumatic diseases is manifold since the histopathological differential diagnosis includes the complete spectrum of synovial diseases. This heterogeneous pathogenetic spectrum is described in the joint pathology algorithm, which includes inflammatory and non-inflammatory diseases. To the latter group belong certain benign tumors such as the diffuse variant of the tenosynovial giant cell tumor, lipoma, hemangioma, vascular malformations and synovial chondromatosis. Additionally, the rare group of storage diseases should be kept in mind. Inflammatory diseases can be discriminated into crystal-induced arthropathies mainly such as gout and pseudogout, into granulomatous diseases such as tuberculosis and foreign-body inoculations, and finally into the large group of non-granulomatous, non-infectious synovitis. This large group is by far the most common, and it often causes difficulties in assigning the histopathological findings to a concrete rheumatologic diagnosis. In this context the synovitis score should be applied as a diagnostic device in these cases, leading to the diagnosis of a low-grade synovitis (which is associated with degenerative arthropathies) or of a high-grade synovitis (associated with rheumatic diseases). Identification of crystals and crystal-like deposits should be carried out with the application of the joint particle algorithm which addresses the identification of endogenous and non-endogenous particle deposits in the synovial tissues. Additionally, the synovitis-score may be used for evaluation of arthritis-progresssion and for the evaluation of inflammation-regression as a consequence of therapy with biologicals.

Indexed as

Joint DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesSynovitisAlgorithmsDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansSynovial MembraneAlgorithmsCrystal arthropathiesInfectious arthritisRheumatoid arthritisSynovitis

Identifiers

PMID30255358
OpenAlexW2894350426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.