Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30255335›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2019

Robotic Double Purse-String Telescoped Pancreaticogastrostomy: How I Do It.

Taiga Wakabayashi, Emanuele Felli, Patrick Pessaux

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 85% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Modified binding pancreaticogastrostomyWorld journal of clinical oncology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Taiga WakabayashiInstitut de Recherche Contre les Cancers de l'Appareil Digestif (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France.
Emanuele FelliDigestive and Endocrine surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Université de Strasbourg, 1 Place de l'hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France.
Patrick PessauxInstitut de Recherche Contre les Cancers de l'Appareil Digestif (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France. patrick.pessaux@chru-strasbourg.fr.
Institut de Recherche contre les Cancers de l’Appareil Digestif · FRHôpital Civil, Strasbourg · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSome articles have recently shown that robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is feasible and can be a safe method. On the other hand, pancreatic fistulas (PF) remain the most dreaded complication after PD, and a secured pancreaticoenteric reconstruction may be essential in this regard. Previous articles have highlighted the usefulness of telescoped pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) in open PD to reduce the risk of postoperative PF. Additionally, in 2016, Addeo et al. described a double purse-string telescoped PG (DPS-PG), simplified from previous techniques, with favorable short-term results. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe attached video reports our standardized technique for robotic DPS-PG, which is based on Addeo's approach. The main characteristic of this technique is an easy placement of two seromuscular purse-string sutures without the need for gastric wall dissection or deep pancreatic parenchymal sutures. We modified and developed Addeo's technique to suit the robotic PD. In our robotic DPS-PG, there is no need to perform the opening of the distal gastric stump, the anterior gastrostomy, or the suture fixation of the pancreatic parenchyma to the stomach, as it could lead to a rupture of the pancreas, particularly when the parenchyma is soft.

resultsWe consider that our technique of robotic DPS-PG might be feasible and can be safely performed, just as a previously described technique in open surgery.

conclusionsFurther evaluation with clinical trials is required to validate its real benefits.

Indexed as

Suture TechniquesHumansPancreaticoduodenectomyRobotic Surgical ProceduresSutures

Identifiers

PMID30255335
OpenAlexW2893149928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.