Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30255246›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2019

Extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography in patients without significant coronary artery disease.

Philipp Karius, Alexander Lembcke, Felix C Sokolowski, Ivan Dario Perez Gandara, Alejandra Rodríguez, Bernd Hamm, Marc Dewey

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Incidental Pulmonary Nodules - What Do We Know in 2022.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Image-based screening].Der Radiologe · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Philipp KariusCharite Medical School, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universitat Berlin, Chariteplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Alexander LembckeCharite Medical School, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universitat Berlin, Chariteplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Felix C SokolowskiCharite Medical School, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universitat Berlin, Chariteplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Ivan Dario Perez GandaraCharite Medical School, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universitat Berlin, Chariteplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Alejandra RodríguezCharite Medical School, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universitat Berlin, Chariteplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Bernd HammCharite Medical School, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universitat Berlin, Chariteplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Marc DeweyCharite Medical School, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universitat Berlin, Chariteplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. dewey@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4402-2733

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DE 1361/14-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyse extracardiac findings in patients without significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in general and in symptomatic patients in particular.

methodsWe searched the Radiology Information System database for coronary computed tomography angiographies (CTA) performed from 2000-2014 and retrospectively enrolled 3,898 patients without significant CAD (coronary stenosis < 50%) in CTA. In 2,330 symptomatic patients, we analysed the spectrum of extracardiac findings and identified pathologies potentially explaining chest pain. Finally, we investigated variables affecting the number of extracardiac findings detected in CTA.

resultsOverall extracardiac findings were found in 1,177 patients (30.2%; 95%CI, 28.8-31.7%). 94 patients (2.4%; 95%CI, 2.0-2.9%) had extracardiac findings with a recommendation for follow-up, sixteen patients (0.4%; 95%CI, 0.3-0.7%) had incidental urgent, and another three patients (0.1%; 95%CI, 0.1-0.2%) had incidental malignant extracardiac findings. 185 of 2,330 symptomatic patients (7.9%; 95%CI, 6.9-9.1%) revealed extracardiac findings potentially explaining chest pain after exclusion of significant CAD. The number of extracardiac findings increased significantly with patient age (p < 0.001) and the cumulative experience of the CT reader (p < 0.001).

conclusion30.2% of patients undergoing CTA for exclusion of CAD had ECF, and 7.9% of symptomatic patients without significant CAD on their examination had findings that could potentially explain their symptoms. KEY POINTS: • Of patients undergoing CTA, 2.8% have relevant incidental extracardiac findings. • CTA could identify the differential diagnosis of chest pain when excluding significant CAD. • Patient age and reader's professional experience influence the number of detected ECFs.

Indexed as

AgedChest PainComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansIncidental FindingsMaleMiddle AgedRadiology Information SystemsRetrospective StudiesAngina pectorisChest painCoronary angiographyIncidental findingsTomography, x-ray computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.