ArticleEuropean radiology2019
Extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography in patients without significant coronary artery disease.
Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography.European radiology · 2022Trial
- Deep learning for estimating right ventricular function from routine coronary angiography.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Clinically Relevant Extracardiac Findings at Cardiac Imaging: Insights from the European MR/CT Registry.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2024Article
- Deep Learning to Estimate Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction From Routine Coronary Angiographic Images.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Unexpected extracardiac findings in cardiac computed tomography from neonates to young adults.Pediatric radiology · 2023Review
- Outcomes in patients with a first episode of chest pain undergoing early coronary CT imaging.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2022Article
- Incidental Pulmonary Nodules - What Do We Know in 2022.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2022Review
- Frequency and spectrum of incidental findings when using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19.European journal of radiology open · 2021Article
- Utility of Emergency Department Chest Imaging in Patients with Cancer: A Descriptive Study.The Journal of emergency medicine · 2020Article
- Developing a lung nodule management protocol specifically for cardiac CT: Methodology in the DISCHARGE trial.European journal of radiology open · 2020Article
- [Image-based screening].Der Radiologe · 2019Article
- Pulmonary embolism initially misdiagnosed as perimyocarditis in a young patıent.Annals of cardiac anaesthesiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo analyse extracardiac findings in patients without significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in general and in symptomatic patients in particular.
methodsWe searched the Radiology Information System database for coronary computed tomography angiographies (CTA) performed from 2000-2014 and retrospectively enrolled 3,898 patients without significant CAD (coronary stenosis < 50%) in CTA. In 2,330 symptomatic patients, we analysed the spectrum of extracardiac findings and identified pathologies potentially explaining chest pain. Finally, we investigated variables affecting the number of extracardiac findings detected in CTA.
resultsOverall extracardiac findings were found in 1,177 patients (30.2%; 95%CI, 28.8-31.7%). 94 patients (2.4%; 95%CI, 2.0-2.9%) had extracardiac findings with a recommendation for follow-up, sixteen patients (0.4%; 95%CI, 0.3-0.7%) had incidental urgent, and another three patients (0.1%; 95%CI, 0.1-0.2%) had incidental malignant extracardiac findings. 185 of 2,330 symptomatic patients (7.9%; 95%CI, 6.9-9.1%) revealed extracardiac findings potentially explaining chest pain after exclusion of significant CAD. The number of extracardiac findings increased significantly with patient age (p < 0.001) and the cumulative experience of the CT reader (p < 0.001).
conclusion30.2% of patients undergoing CTA for exclusion of CAD had ECF, and 7.9% of symptomatic patients without significant CAD on their examination had findings that could potentially explain their symptoms. KEY POINTS: • Of patients undergoing CTA, 2.8% have relevant incidental extracardiac findings. • CTA could identify the differential diagnosis of chest pain when excluding significant CAD. • Patient age and reader's professional experience influence the number of detected ECFs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30255246What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.