Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30255008›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2018

Bridging the Data Gap From

Qiang Zhang, Jin Li, Alistair Middleton, Sudin Bhattacharya, Rory B Conolly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Extrapolation steps in quantitativeCurrent research in toxicology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Incorporating new approach methods (NAMs) data in dose-response assessments: The future is now!Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Hepatic cholesterol biosynthesis and dioxin-induced dysregulation: A multiscale computational approach.Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. What's next for computational systems biology?Frontiers in systems biology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qiang ZhangDepartment of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Jin LiUnilever, Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, United Kingdom.
Alistair MiddletonUnilever, Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, United Kingdom.
Sudin BhattacharyaBiomedical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Rory B ConollyIntegrated Systems Toxicology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC, United States.

Funding

VOLATILE ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS--QUANTIFYING THEIR MOVEMENT IN THE UNSATURATED ZONEP42ES004911 · NIEHS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Timothy R. Zacharewski · 1989 to 2026
$64.9M
Pilot Project ProgramP30ES019776 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Carmen Joseph Marsit · 2013 to 2026
$22.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES019776NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES004911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical toxicity testing is moving steadily toward a human cell and organoid-based

Indexed as

computational modelingextrapolationin vitroin vivopoint of departurerisk assessmenttoxicity pathway

Identifiers

PMID30255008
PMCPMC6141783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.