Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30254594›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018

Limited Usefulness of Capture Procedure and Capture Percentage for Evaluating Reproducibility in Psychological Science.

Yongtian Cheng, Johnson Ching-Hong Li, Xiyao Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yongtian ChengDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Johnson Ching-Hong LiDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Xiyao LiuDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In psychological science, there is an increasing concern regarding the reproducibility of scientific findings. For instance, Replication Project: Psychology (Open Science Collaboration, 2015) found that the proportion of successful replication in psychology was 41%. This proportion was calculated based on Cumming and Maillardet (2006) widely employed

Indexed as

capture percentagecapture procedureeffect sizesreproducibilitysimulation

Identifiers

PMID30254594
PMCPMC6141826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.