Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30254420›Full record

ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2018

Chemopreventive activity of sulforaphane.

Xin Jiang, Ye Liu, Lixin Ma, Rui Ji, Yaqin Qu, Ying Xin, Guoyue Lv

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Comparative Studies of Extracts Obtained fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xin JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
Ye LiuDepartment of Pathobiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China.
Lixin MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
Rui JiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Florida Hospital, Orlando, FL, USA.
Yaqin QuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
Ying XinKey Laboratory of Pathobiology, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China, xinying13@126.com.
Guoyue LvDepartment of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China, lgy08@sina.com.
Jilin University · CNAdventHealth Orlando · USSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in the world. Carcinogenesis is a multistep process induced by genetic and epigenetic changes that disrupt pathways controlling cell proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, and senescence. In this context, many bioactive dietary compounds from vegetables and fruits have been demonstrated to be effective in cancer prevention and intervention. Over the years, sulforaphane (SFN), found in cruciferous vegetables, has been shown to have chemopreventive activity in vitro and in vivo. SFN protects cells from environmental carcinogens and also induces growth arrest and/or apoptosis in various cancer cells. In this review, we will discuss several potential mechanisms of the chemopreventive activity of SFN, including regulation of Phase I and Phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes, cell cycle arrest, and induction of apoptosis, especially via regulation of signaling pathways such as Nrf2-Keap1 and NF-κB. Recent studies suggest that SFN can also affect the epigenetic control of key genes and greatly influence the initiation and progression of cancer. This research may provide a basis for the clinical use of SFN for cancer chemoprevention and enable us to design preventive strategies for cancer management, reduce cancer development and recurrence, and thus improve patient survival.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnticarcinogenic AgentsApoptosisCell Cycle CheckpointsCell ProliferationHumansIsothiocyanatesMetabolic Detoxication, Phase IMetabolic Detoxication, Phase IINeoplasmsSulfoxidesAnticarcinogenic AgentsIsothiocyanatessulforaphaneSulfoxidesanti-inflammatoryapoptosiscell cycle progressionchemopreventionepigeneticsPhase I and Phase II drug-metabolizing enzymessulforaphanetumor

Identifiers

PMID30254420
PMCPMC6141106
OpenAlexW2890257196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.