Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30254264›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

An OB-fold complex controls the repair pathways for DNA double-strand breaks.

Shengxian Gao, Sumin Feng, Shaokai Ning, Jingyan Liu, Huayu Zhao, Yixi Xu, Jinfeng Shang, Kejiao Li, Qing Li, Rong Guo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. eLife · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shengxian GaoState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Sumin FengState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Shaokai NingState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Jingyan LiuState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Huayu ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Yixi XuState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Jinfeng ShangState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Kejiao LiState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Qing LiState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0251-9159
Rong GuoState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China. guorong@pku.edu.cn.
Dongyi XuState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China. xudongyi@pku.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5711-2618
Peking University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31661143040National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31870807National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 81672773
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

53BP1 with its downstream proteins, RIF1, PTIP and REV7, antagonizes BRCA1-dependent homologous recombination (HR) and promotes non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) in an unclear manner. Here we show that REV7 forms a complex with two proteins, FAM35A and C20ORF196. We demonstrate that FAM35A preferentially binds single-strand DNA (ssDNA) in vitro, and is recruited to DSBs as a complex with C20ORF196 and REV7 downstream of RIF1 in vivo. Epistasis analysis shows that both proteins act in the same pathway as RIF1 in NHEJ. The defects in HR pathway to repair DSBs and the reduction in resection of broken DNA ends in BRCA1-mutant cells can be largely suppressed by inactivating FAM35A or C20ORF196, indicating that FAM35A and C20ORF196 prevent end resection in these cells. Together, our data identified a REV7-FAM35A-C20ORF196 complex that binds and protects broken DNA ends to promote the NHEJ pathway for DSB repair.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA End-Joining RepairSignal TransductionAnimalsBRCA1 ProteinCell Cycle ProteinsCell Line, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsHCT116 CellsHomologous RecombinationHumansMad2 ProteinsMultiprotein ComplexesProteinsRNA InterferenceTelomere-Binding ProteinsBRCA1 ProteinCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsMAD2L2 protein, humanMad2 ProteinsMultiprotein ComplexesProteinsRif1 protein, humanSHLD2 protein, humanTelomere-Binding ProteinsTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1

Identifiers

PMID30254264
PMCPMC6156606
OpenAlexW2891898616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.