Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30254229›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Comparison of spectral and spatial denoising techniques in the context of High Definition FT-IR imaging hyperspectral data.

Paulina Koziol, Magda K Raczkowska, Justyna Skibinska, Sławka Urbaniak-Wasik, Czesława Paluszkiewicz, Wojciech Kwiatek, Tomasz P Wrobel

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Secondary structure and stability of a gel-forming tardigrade desiccation-tolerance protein.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paulina KoziolInstitute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342, Krakow, Poland.
Magda K RaczkowskaInstitute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342, Krakow, Poland.
Justyna SkibinskaInstitute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342, Krakow, Poland.
Sławka Urbaniak-WasikNZOZ Pathology Department, Jagiellonska 70, Kielce, Poland.
Czesława PaluszkiewiczInstitute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342, Krakow, Poland.
Wojciech KwiatekInstitute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342, Krakow, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2197-8572
Tomasz P WrobelInstitute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342, Krakow, Poland. tomasz.wrobel@ifj.edu.pl.

Funding

Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej (Foundation for Polish Science) Homing/2016-2/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent emergence of High Definition (HD) FT-IR and Quantum Cascade Laser (QCL) Microscopes elevated the IR imaging field very close to clinical timescales. However, the speed of acquisition and data quality are still the critical factors in reaching the clinic. Denoising offers aide in both aspects if performed properly. However, there is a lack of a direct comparison of the efficiency of denoising techniques in IR imaging in general. To achieve such comparison within a rigorous framework and obtaining the critical information about signal loss, a simulated dataset strongly bound by experimental parameters was created. Using experimental structural and spectral information and experimental noise levels data as an input for the simulation, a direct comparison of spatial (Fourier transform, Mean Filter, Weighted Mean Filter, Gauss Filter, Median Filter, spatial Wavelets and Deep Neural Networks) and spectral (Savitzky-Golay, Fourier transform, Principal Component Analysis, Minimum Noise Fraction and spectral Wavelets) denoising schemes was enabled. All of these techniques were compared on the simulated dataset, taking into account SNR gain, signal distortion and sensitivity to tuning parameters as comparison metrics. Later, the best techniques were applied to experimental data for validation. The results presented here clearly show the benefit of using hyperspectral denoising schemes such as PCA and MNF which outperform other methods.

Identifiers

PMID30254229
PMCPMC6156560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.