Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30254175›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Structure of a PSI-LHCI-cyt b

Janina Steinbeck, Ian L Ross, Rosalba Rothnagel, Philipp Gäbelein, Stefan Schulze, Nichole Giles, Rubbiya Ali, Rohan Drysdale, Emma Sierecki, Yann Gambin and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Light-Driven HPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Protein assemblies in theFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  8. Characterization of PetM cytochromeHorticulture research · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Janina SteinbeckInstitute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Münster, 48143 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7793-5053
Ian L RossInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2389-4292
Rosalba RothnagelInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Philipp GäbeleinInstitute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Münster, 48143 Münster, Germany.
Stefan SchulzeInstitute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Münster, 48143 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4771-7987
Nichole GilesEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory Single Molecule Science, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Rubbiya AliInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3241-5692
Rohan DrysdaleInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Emma SiereckiEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory Single Molecule Science, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9970-868X
Yann GambinEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory Single Molecule Science, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Henning StahlbergCenter for Cellular Imaging and NanoAnalytics, Biozentrum, University of Basel, CH-4058 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1185-4592
Yuichiro TakahashiResearch Institute for Interdisciplinary Science, Okayama University, 700-8530 Okayama, Japan.
Michael HipplerInstitute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Münster, 48143 Münster, Germany; mhippler@uni-muenster.de b.hankamer@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-9670-6101
Ben HankamerInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; mhippler@uni-muenster.de b.hankamer@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-9284-4929
The University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Münster · DEUNSW Sydney · AUOkayama University of Science · JPUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photosynthetic linear electron flow (LEF) produces ATP and NADPH, while cyclic electron flow (CEF) exclusively drives photophosphorylation to supply extra ATP. The fine-tuning of linear and cyclic electron transport levels allows photosynthetic organisms to balance light energy absorption with cellular energy requirements under constantly changing light conditions. As LEF and CEF share many electron transfer components, a key question is how the same individual structural units contribute to these two different functional modes. Here, we report the structural identification of a photosystem I (PSI)-light harvesting complex I (LHCI)-cytochrome (cyt) b

Indexed as

ElectronsPhotosynthesisAnaerobiosisChlamydomonas reinhardtiiCytochrome b6f ComplexElectron TransportLight-Harvesting Protein ComplexesModels, MolecularMultiprotein ComplexesOxidation-ReductionPhotosystem I Protein ComplexProtein ConformationCytochrome b6f ComplexLight-Harvesting Protein ComplexesMultiprotein ComplexesPhotosystem I Protein ComplexChlamydomonas reinhardtiicyclic electron flowcytochrome b6fphotosystem Isupercomplex

Identifiers

PMID30254175
PMCPMC6187136
OpenAlexW2893863625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.