Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30254135›Full record

Trial reportGut2019

Follow-on RifAximin for the Prevention of recurrence following standard treatment of Infection with

Giles Major, Lucy Bradshaw, Nafisa Boota, Kirsty Sprange, Mathew Diggle, Alan Montgomery, Aida Jawhari, Robin C Spiller, RAPID Collaboration Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gut, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01670149 (A Randomised Placebo Controlled Trial of "Follow on" Rifaximin for the Prevention of Relapse of Clostridium Associated Diarrhoea), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01670149 phase4completednot on this map

A Randomised Placebo Controlled Trial of "Follow on" Rifaximin for the Prevention of Relapse of Clostridium Associated Diarrhoea

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NottinghamRan2012 to 2016Enrolled151ConditionsClostridium Difficile InfectionArmsRifaximin, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Genomic and phenotypic insight intoEmerging microbes & infections · 2026
    Article
  3. Diarrhea management: from pathophysiology to microbiota modulation.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Comparative effectiveness of different therapies forThe Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. The management ofMedicine and pharmacy reports · 2024
    Review
  9. Inflammatory bowel disease andTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Cost-effectiveness of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for First Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Cost-effectiveness of Treatment Regimens for Clostridioides difficile Infection: An Evaluation of the 2018 Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Management ofTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Giles MajorNottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Notts, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7944-3709
Lucy BradshawNottingham Clinical Trials Unit (NCTU), University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Nafisa BootaLeicester Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Kirsty SprangeNottingham Clinical Trials Unit (NCTU), University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Mathew DiggleClinical Microbiology Department, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, UK.
Alan MontgomeryNottingham Clinical Trials Unit (NCTU), University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Aida JawhariClinical Microbiology Department, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, UK.
Robin C SpillerNottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Notts, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6371-4500
RAPID Collaboration Group
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-1010-23257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClostridium difficile infection (CDI) recurs after initial treatment in approximately one in four patients. A single-centre pilot study suggested that this could be reduced using 'follow-on' rifaximin treatment. We aimed to assess the efficacy of rifaximin treatment in preventing recurrence.

methodsA multisite, parallel group, randomised, placebo controlled trial recruiting patients aged ≥18 years immediately after resolution of CDI through treatment with metronidazole or vancomycin. Participants received either rifaximin 400 mg three times a day for 2 weeks, reduced to 200 mg three times a day for a further 2 weeks or identical placebo. The primary endpoint was recurrence of CDI within 12 weeks of trial entry.

resultsBetween December 2012 and March 2016, 151 participants were randomised to either rifaximin or placebo. Primary outcome data were available on 130. Mean age was 71.9 years (SD 15.3). Recurrence within 12 weeks was 29.5% (18/61) among participants allocated to placebo compared with 15.9% (11/69) among those allocated to rifaximin, a difference between groups of 13.7% (95% CI -28.1% to 0.7%, p=0.06). The risk ratio was 0.54 (95% CI 0.28 to 1.05, p=0.07). During 6-month safety follow-up, nine participants died in each group (12%). Adverse event rates were similar between groups.

conclusionWhile 'follow-on' rifaximin after CDI appeared to halve recurrence rate, we failed to reach our recruitment target in this group of frail elderly patients, so the estimated effect of rifaximin lacks precision. A meta-analysis including a previous trial suggests that rifaximin may be effective; however, further, larger confirmatory studies are needed.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsClostridium InfectionsDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMaleMetronidazoleMiddle AgedRifaximinSecondary PreventionVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsMetronidazoleRifaximinVancomycindiarrhoeaenteric infectionsinfective colitisinflammation

Identifiers

PMID30254135
PMCPMC6582824
OpenAlexW2892869358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.