Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30254095›Full record

ReviewBMJ quality & safety2019

Using objective clinical data to track progress on preventing and treating sepsis: CDC's new 'Adult Sepsis Event' surveillance strategy.

Chanu Rhee, Raymund Barretto Dantes, Lauren Epstein, Michael Klompas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ quality & safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. What Can We Learn from Differences in Hospitals' Sepsis Care?American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Improving Sepsis Outcomes in the Era of Pay-for-Performance and Electronic Quality Measures: A Joint IDSA/ACEP/PIDS/SHEA/SHM/SIDP Position Paper.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chanu RheeDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School/Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA crhee@bwh.harvard.edu.
Raymund Barretto DantesDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Lauren EpsteinDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Michael KlompasDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School/Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Objective Evaluation of Variation in Sepsis Incidence, Mortality, and CareK08HS025008 · AHRQ · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI RHEE, CHANU · 2017 to 2019
$450k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS025008Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceAdultCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.HumansQuality ImprovementSepsisUnited Statescritical carehealthcare quality improvementquality measurement

Identifiers

PMID30254095
PMCPMC6557151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.