Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30254078›Full record

ArticleBiology open2018

Comparison of circulating metabolite concentrations in dogs and cats when allowed to freely choose macronutrient intake.

Jean A Hall, Matthew I Jackson, Jodi C Vondran, Melissa A Vanchina, Dennis E Jewell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gaps and Controversies in Feline Food Palatability.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Amino acid nutrition and metabolism in domestic cats and dogs.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jean A HallDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Dryden Hall 206, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-4802, USA Jean.Hall@oregonstate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7758-6703
Matthew I JacksonPet Nutrition Center, Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc, 1035 NE 43rd Street, Topeka, Kansas 66617-1587, USA.
Jodi C VondranPet Nutrition Center, Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc, 1035 NE 43rd Street, Topeka, Kansas 66617-1587, USA.
Melissa A VanchinaPet Nutrition Center, Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc, 1035 NE 43rd Street, Topeka, Kansas 66617-1587, USA.
Dennis E JewellPet Nutrition Center, Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc, 1035 NE 43rd Street, Topeka, Kansas 66617-1587, USA.
Hill's Pet Nutrition (United States)Oregon State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food intake changes circulating metabolite concentrations. Thus, a comparison of circulating metabolites between dogs and cats is necessarily confounded by the composition of foods offered. The objective of this study was to determine differences between dogs and cats when given the opportunity to choose their own macronutrient intake. Four experimental foods with similar palatability, but varying in macronutrient content were prepared for dogs, and four for cats. Foods were available to dogs (

Indexed as

CatsCirculating metabolitesDogsFood intakeMacronutrient intake

Identifiers

PMID30254078
PMCPMC6262854
OpenAlexW2893455260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.