Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30253752›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

Comparison of RNA-seq and microarray platforms for splice event detection using a cross-platform algorithm.

Juan P Romero, María Ortiz-Estévez, Ander Muniategui, Soraya Carrancio, Fernando J de Miguel, Fernando Carazo, Luis M Montuenga, Remco Loos, Rubén Pío, Matthew W B Trotter and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Juan P RomeroCEIT and Tecnun, University of Navarra, Parque Tecnológico de San Sebastián, Paseo Mikeletegi 48, 20009, San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, Spain.
María Ortiz-EstévezCelgene Institute for Translational Research Europe, Celgene Corporation, Parque Científico y Tecnológico Cartuja 93, Centro de Empresas Pabellón de Italia, Isaac Newton, 4, E-41092, Seville, Spain.
Ander MuniateguiCEIT and Tecnun, University of Navarra, Parque Tecnológico de San Sebastián, Paseo Mikeletegi 48, 20009, San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, Spain.
Soraya CarrancioCelgene Institute for Translational Research Europe, Celgene Corporation, Parque Científico y Tecnológico Cartuja 93, Centro de Empresas Pabellón de Italia, Isaac Newton, 4, E-41092, Seville, Spain.
Fernando J de MiguelProgram in Solid Tumors and Biomarkers, CIMA, University of Navarra, Avda. Pío XII, 55, E-31008, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Fernando CarazoCEIT and Tecnun, University of Navarra, Parque Tecnológico de San Sebastián, Paseo Mikeletegi 48, 20009, San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, Spain.
Luis M MontuengaProgram in Solid Tumors and Biomarkers, CIMA, University of Navarra, Avda. Pío XII, 55, E-31008, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Remco LoosCelgene Institute for Translational Research Europe, Celgene Corporation, Parque Científico y Tecnológico Cartuja 93, Centro de Empresas Pabellón de Italia, Isaac Newton, 4, E-41092, Seville, Spain.
Rubén PíoProgram in Solid Tumors and Biomarkers, CIMA, University of Navarra, Avda. Pío XII, 55, E-31008, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Matthew W B TrotterCelgene Institute for Translational Research Europe, Celgene Corporation, Parque Científico y Tecnológico Cartuja 93, Centro de Empresas Pabellón de Italia, Isaac Newton, 4, E-41092, Seville, Spain.
Angel RubioCEIT and Tecnun, University of Navarra, Parque Tecnológico de San Sebastián, Paseo Mikeletegi 48, 20009, San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, Spain. arubio@tecnun.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3274-2450
Centro de Estudios e Investigaciones Técnicas de Gipuzkoa · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESUniversidad de Navarra · ES

Funding

Yale Cancer Biology Training GrantT32CA193200 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PETER M GLAZER, Qin Yan · 2016 to 2026
$3.6M
Eusko Jaurlaritza PRE_2016_1_0194Fundación Científica Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer GCB14-2170NCI NIH HHS T32 CA193200Secretaría de Estado de Investigacion, Desarrollo e Innovacion PI14/00806Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación PI14/00806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRNA-seq is a reference technology for determining alternative splicing at genome-wide level. Exon arrays remain widely used for the analysis of gene expression, but show poor validation rate with regard to splicing events. Commercial arrays that include probes within exon junctions have been developed in order to overcome this problem. We compare the performance of RNA-seq (Illumina HiSeq) and junction arrays (Affymetrix Human Transcriptome array) for the analysis of transcript splicing events. Three different breast cancer cell lines were treated with CX-4945, a drug that severely affects splicing. To enable a direct comparison of the two platforms, we adapted EventPointer, an algorithm that detects and labels alternative splicing events using junction arrays, to work also on RNA-seq data. Common results and discrepancies between the technologies were validated and/or resolved by over 200 PCR experiments.

resultsAs might be expected, RNA-seq appears superior in cases where the technologies disagree and is able to discover novel splicing events beyond the limitations of physical probe-sets. We observe a high degree of coherence between the two technologies, however, with correlation of EventPointer results over 0.90. Through decimation, the detection power of the junction arrays is equivalent to RNA-seq with up to 60 million reads.

conclusionsOur results suggest, therefore, that exon-junction arrays are a viable alternative to RNA-seq for detection of alternative splicing events when focusing on well-described transcriptional regions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAlternative SplicingGene Expression ProfilingOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisSequence Analysis, RNACell Line, TumorHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionAlternative splicingMicroarraysRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID30253752
PMCPMC6156849
OpenAlexW2950410184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.