Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30253751›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

Impact of energy restriction during late gestation on the muscle and blood transcriptome of beef calves after preconditioning.

Leticia P Sanglard, Moysés Nascimento, Philipe Moriel, Jeffrey Sommer, Melissa Ashwell, Matthew H Poore, Márcio de S Duarte, Nick V L Serão

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Maternal Nutrition and Developmental Programming of Male Progeny.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Differential protein input in the maternal diet alters the skeletal muscle transcriptome in fetal sheep.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leticia P SanglardDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, 50011, USA.
Moysés NascimentoDepartment of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 27695, USA.
Philipe MorielRange Cattle Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Ona, Florida, 33865, USA.
Jeffrey SommerDepartment of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 27695, USA.
Melissa AshwellDepartment of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 27695, USA.
Matthew H PooreDepartment of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 27695, USA.
Márcio de S DuarteDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, 36570-000, Brazil.
Nick V L SerãoDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, 50011, USA. serao@iastate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6758-208X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal nutrition has been highlighted as one of the main factors affecting intra-uterine environment. The increase in nutritional requirements by beef cows during late gestation can cause nutritional deficiency in the fetus and impact the fetal regulation of genes associated with myogenesis and immune response.

methodsForty days before the expected calving date, cows were assigned to one of two diets: 100% (control) or 70% (restricted group) of the daily energy requirement. Muscle samples were collected from 12 heifers and 12 steers, and blood samples were collected from 12 steers. The objective of this work was to identify and to assess the biological relevance of differentially expressed genes (DEG) in the skeletal muscle and blood of beef calves born from cows that experienced [or not] a 30% energy restriction during the last 40 days of gestation.

resultsA total of 160, 164, and 346 DEG (q-value< 0.05) were identified in the skeletal muscle for the effects of diet, sex, and diet-by-sex interaction, respectively. For blood, 452, 1392, and 155 DEG were identified for the effects of diet, time, and diet-by-time interaction, respectively. For skeletal muscle, results based on diet identified genes involved in muscle metabolism. In muscle, from the 10 most DEG down-regulated in the energy-restricted group (REST), we identified 5 genes associated with muscle metabolism and development: SLCO3A1, ATP6V0D1, SLC2A1, GPC4, and RASD2. In blood, among the 10 most DEG, we found genes related to response to stress up-regulated in the REST after weaning, such as SOD3 and INO80D, and to immune response down-regulated in the REST after vaccination, such as OASL, KLRF1, and LOC104968634.

conclusionIn conclusion, maternal energy restriction during late gestation may limit the expression of genes in the muscle and increase expression in the blood of calves. In addition, enrichment analysis showed that a short-term maternal energy restriction during pregnancy affects the expression of genes related to energy metabolism and muscle contraction, and immunity and stress response in the blood. Therefore, alterations in the intra-uterine environment can modify prenatal development with lasting consequences to adult life.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsCattleFemaleGene Regulatory NetworksMaleMuscle, SkeletalPregnancyFetal developmentFetal programmingGene expressionRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID30253751
PMCPMC6156876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.