Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30253713›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment2018

Moderate Heat Application Enhances the Efficacy of Nanosecond Pulse Stimulation for the Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Chelsea M Edelblute, Siqi Guo, James Hornef, Enbo Yang, Chunqi Jiang, Karl Schoenbach, Richard Heller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Synergistic effects of an atmospheric pressure plasma jet and pulsed electric field on cells and skin.IEEE transactions on plasma science. IEEE Nuclear and Plasma Sciences Society · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chelsea M Edelblute1 Frank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Siqi Guo1 Frank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
James Hornef1 Frank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Enbo Yang1 Frank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Chunqi Jiang1 Frank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Karl Schoenbach1 Frank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Richard Heller1 Frank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1899-3859
Old Dominion University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanosecond pulse stimulation as a tumor ablation therapy has been studied for the treatment of various carcinomas in animal models and has shown a significant survival benefit. In the current study, we found that moderate heating at 43°C for 2 minutes significantly enhanced in vitro nanosecond pulse stimulation-induced cell death of KLN205 murine squamous cell carcinoma cells by 2.43-fold at 600 V and by 2.32-fold at 900 V, as evidenced by propidium iodide uptake. Furthermore, the ablation zone in KLN205 cells placed in a 3-dimensional cell-culture model and pulsed at a voltage of 900 V at 43°C was 3 times larger than in cells exposed to nanosecond pulse stimulation at room temperature. Application of moderate heating alone did not cause cell death. A nanosecond pulse stimulation electrode with integrated controllable laser heating was developed to treat murine ectopic squamous cell carcinoma. With this innovative system, we were able to quickly heat and maintain the temperature of the target tumor at 43°C during nanosecond pulse stimulation. Nanosecond pulse stimulation with moderate heating was shown to significantly extend overall survival, delay tumor growth, and achieve a high rate of complete tumor regression. Moderate heating extended survival nearly 3-fold where median overall survival was 22 days for 9.8 kV without moderate heating and over 63 days for tumors pulsed with 600, 100 ns pulses at 5 Hz, at voltage of 9.8 kV with moderate heating. Median overall survival in the control groups was 24 and 31 days for mice with untreated tumors and tumors receiving moderate heat alone, respectively. Nearly 69% (11 of 16) of tumor-bearing mice treated with nanosecond pulse stimulation with moderate heating were tumor free at the completion of the study, whereas complete tumor regression was not observed in the control groups and in 9.8 kV without moderate heating. These results suggest moderate heating can reduce the necessary applied voltage for tumor ablation with nanosecond pulse stimulation.

Indexed as

Laser TherapyAnimalsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Line, TumorDisease Models, AnimalElectroporationHot TemperatureHumansMiceablationelectroporationirreversible electroporationnanosecond pulse electric fieldnanosecond pulse stimulation

Identifiers

PMID30253713
PMCPMC6156209
OpenAlexW2893250584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.