Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30253229›Full record

ArticleResuscitation2018

Predicting in-hospital mortality and unanticipated admissions to the intensive care unit using routinely collected blood tests and vital signs: Development and validation of a multivariable model.

Oliver C Redfern, Marco A F Pimentel, David Prytherch, Paul Meredith, David A Clifton, Lionel Tarassenko, Gary B Smith, Peter J Watkinson

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Vital Signs Prediction for COVID-19 Patients in ICU.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Oliver C RedfernCentre for Healthcare Modelling and Informatics, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
Marco A F PimentelInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: marco.pimentel@eng.ox.ac.uk.
David PrytherchCentre for Healthcare Modelling and Informatics, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
Paul MeredithResearch and Innovation Department, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.
David A CliftonInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lionel TarassenkoInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Gary B SmithFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
Peter J WatkinsonNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Department of HealthWellcome Trust WT-103703/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe National Early Warning System (NEWS) is based on vital signs; the Laboratory Decision Tree Early Warning Score (LDT-EWS) on laboratory test results. We aimed to develop and validate a new EWS (the LDTEWS:NEWS risk index) by combining the two and evaluating the discrimination of the primary outcome of unanticipated intensive care unit (ICU) admission or in-hospital mortality, within 24 h.

methodsWe studied emergency medical admissions, aged 16 years or over, admitted to Oxford University Hospitals (OUH) and Portsmouth Hospitals (PH). Each admission had vital signs and laboratory tests measured within their hospital stay. We combined LDT-EWS and NEWS values using a linear time-decay weighting function imposed on the most recent blood tests. The LDTEWS:NEWS risk index was developed using data from 5 years of admissions to PH, and validated on a year of data from both PH and OUH. We tested the risk index's ability to discriminate the primary outcome using the c-statistic.

resultsThe development cohort contained 97,933 admissions (median age = 73 years) of which 4723 (4.8%) resulted inhospital death and 1078 (1.1%) in unanticipated ICU admission. We validated the risk index using data from PH (n = 21,028) and OUH (n = 16,383). The risk index showed a higher discrimination in the validation sets (c-statistic value (95% CI)) (PH, 0.901 (0.898-0.905); OUH, 0.916 (0.911-0.921)), than NEWS alone (PH, 0.877 (0.873-0.882); OUH, 0.898 (0.893-0.904)).

conclusionsThe LDTEWS:NEWS risk index increases the ability to identify patients at risk of deterioration, compared to NEWS alone.

Indexed as

Hematologic TestsHospital MortalityIntensive Care UnitsVital SignsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityEarly warning scoreLaboratory test resultsPhysiological monitoringVital signs

Identifiers

PMID30253229
PMCPMC6562198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.