Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30252915›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Patient-specific seizure prediction based on heart rate variability and recurrence quantification analysis.

Lucia Billeci, Daniela Marino, Laura Insana, Giampaolo Vatti, Maurizio Varanini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. ECG-Based Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detection for Early Detection and Monitoring of Epileptic Seizures.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucia BilleciInstitute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5487-0277
Daniela MarinoDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0688-4495
Laura InsanaDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Giampaolo VattiDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Maurizio VaraniniInstitute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epilepsy is often associated with modifications in autonomic nervous system, which usually precede the onset of seizures of several minutes. Thus, there is a great interest in identifying these modifications enough time in advance to prevent a dangerous effect and to intervene. In addition, these changes can be a risk factor for epileptic patients and can increase the possibility of death. Notably autonomic changes associated to seizures are highly depended of seizure type, localization and lateralization. The aim of this study was to develop a patient-specific approach to predict seizures using electrocardiogram (ECG) features. Specifically, from the RR series, both time and frequency variables and features obtained by the recurrence quantification analysis were used. The algorithm was applied in a dataset of 15 patients with 38 different types of seizures. A feature selection step, was used to identify those features that were more significant in discriminating preictal and interictal phases. A preictal interval of 15 minutes was selected. A support vector machine (SVM) classifier was then built to classify preictal and interictal phases. First, a classifier was set up to classify preictal and interictal segments of each patient and an average sensibility of 89.06% was obtained, with a number of false positive per hour (FP/h) of 0.41. Then, in those patients who had at least 3 seizures, a double-cross-validation approach was used to predict unseen seizures on the basis of a training on previous ones. The results were quite variable according to seizure type, achieving the best performance in patients with more stereotypical seizure. The results of the proposed approach show that it is feasible to predict seizure in advance, considering patient-specific, and possible seizure specific, characteristics.

Indexed as

Heart RateAdolescentAdultChildComputational BiologyElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleRecurrenceSeizuresSupport Vector MachineYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30252915
PMCPMC6155519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.