ArticlePloS one2018
Patient-specific seizure prediction based on heart rate variability and recurrence quantification analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Feasibility of cardiac-based seizure detection and prediction: A systematic review of non-invasive wearable sensor-based studies.Epilepsia open · 2024Pooled it
- A systematic review of non-invasive biomarkers for seizure forecasting in pediatric epilepsy patients.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- HRV features as potential biomarkers for auxiliary diagnosis in epilepsy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Owner reported prevalence of autonomic signs in epileptic dogs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Autonomic biosignals, seizure detection, and forecasting.Epilepsia · 2025Review
- Forecasting epileptic seizures with wearable devices: A hybrid short- and long-horizon pseudo-prospective approach.Epilepsia · 2025Article
- Ultra-short-term heart rate variability using a photoplethysmography-based smartphone application: a TeleCheck-AF subanalysis.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- ECG-based epileptic seizure prediction: Challenges of current data-driven models.Epilepsia open · 2025Article
- Neural network-based method for measuring the impacts of epileptic brain activities on cardiac cycles.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- The Interplay of Sports and Nutrition in Neurological Health and Recovery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Heart Rate Variability as a Tool for Seizure Prediction: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Patient-Specific Preictal Pattern-Aware Epileptic Seizure Prediction with Federated Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Electrocardiogram Changes in the Postictal Phase of Epileptic Seizure: Results from a Prospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Wearable Sensors to Evaluate Autonomic Response to Olfactory Stimulation: The Influence of Short, Intensive Sensory Training.Biosensors · 2023Article
- ECG-Based Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detection for Early Detection and Monitoring of Epileptic Seizures.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Cross-Domain Transfer of EEG to EEG or ECG Learning for CNN Classification Models.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Automatic epileptic seizure detection based on persistent homology.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- The connection between heart rate variability (HRV), neurological health, and cognition: A literature review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Horticultural Therapy May Reduce Psychological and Physiological Stress in Adolescents with Anorexia Nervosa: A Pilot Study.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Longitudinally tracking personal physiomes for precision management of childhood epilepsy.PLOS digital health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epilepsy is often associated with modifications in autonomic nervous system, which usually precede the onset of seizures of several minutes. Thus, there is a great interest in identifying these modifications enough time in advance to prevent a dangerous effect and to intervene. In addition, these changes can be a risk factor for epileptic patients and can increase the possibility of death. Notably autonomic changes associated to seizures are highly depended of seizure type, localization and lateralization. The aim of this study was to develop a patient-specific approach to predict seizures using electrocardiogram (ECG) features. Specifically, from the RR series, both time and frequency variables and features obtained by the recurrence quantification analysis were used. The algorithm was applied in a dataset of 15 patients with 38 different types of seizures. A feature selection step, was used to identify those features that were more significant in discriminating preictal and interictal phases. A preictal interval of 15 minutes was selected. A support vector machine (SVM) classifier was then built to classify preictal and interictal phases. First, a classifier was set up to classify preictal and interictal segments of each patient and an average sensibility of 89.06% was obtained, with a number of false positive per hour (FP/h) of 0.41. Then, in those patients who had at least 3 seizures, a double-cross-validation approach was used to predict unseen seizures on the basis of a training on previous ones. The results were quite variable according to seizure type, achieving the best performance in patients with more stereotypical seizure. The results of the proposed approach show that it is feasible to predict seizure in advance, considering patient-specific, and possible seizure specific, characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.