ArticleJournal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention2018
Dietary Micronutrient Intake of Participants in a "Partners Together in Health" Cardiac Rehabilitation Intervention.
Article in Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Teaching Kitchen Program Improves Employee Micronutrient and Healthy Dietary Consumption.Nutrition and metabolic insights · 2023Article
- Retinoic acid regulates pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 (Pdk4) to modulate fuel utilization in the adult heart: Insights from wild-type and β-carotene 9',10' oxygenase knockout mice.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2022Article
- Early cardiac rehabilitation: could it improve functional outcomes and reduce length of stay and sanitary costs in patients aged 75 years or older? A retrospective case-control study.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2021Article
- Fruits and Vegetables in the Management of Underlying Conditions for COVID-19 High-Risk Groups.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCurrent guidelines for cardiovascular health emphasize a "dietary pattern" approach that could be expected to increase intakes of micronutrients in addition to altering the macronutrient profile. However, the effect of interventions such as cardiac rehabilitation on the micronutrient quality of the diet has not been evaluated. Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate changes in micronutrient intake of cardiac rehabilitation participants over time.
methodsThis was a secondary analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial that assessed the effects of the Partners Together in Health intervention on physical activity and healthy eating behaviors. The intake of 9 micronutrients important in cardiovascular health was assessed using 3-d food records. A micronutrient adequacy score was evaluated at 3 time points (baseline, 3 and 6 mo). Changes over time in micronutrient intake were assessed using a general linear model.
resultsSixty-eight participants who were enrolled in the Partners Together in Health interventional trial completed the study. There was no significant difference in the mean micronutrient score at any time point. Intake of individual micronutrients did not improve over the 6-mo time frame with the exception of vitamin E, (8.7 mg vs 6.5 mg for at 6 vs 3 mo, P = .02). The proportion of participants with intakes meeting the Dietary Recommended Intake for each nutrient also remained the same over time.
conclusionAlthough cardiac rehabilitation programs may be effective in altering the macronutrient composition, improvements to overall diet quality may be tempered by a lack of improvement in intake of micronutrients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.