ArticlemAbs
Antibody-drug conjugate library prepared by scanning insertion of the aldehyde tag into IgG1 constant regions.
Article in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- A review of conjugation technologies for antibody drug conjugates.Antibody therapeutics · 2025Review
- Business Risk Mitigation in the Development Process of New Monoclonal Antibody Drug Conjugates for Cancer Treatment.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advantages of site-specific over stochastic bioconjugation technologies include homogeneity of product, minimal perturbation of protein structure/function, and - increasingly - the ability to perform structure activity relationship studies at the conjugate level. When selecting the optimal location for site-specific payload placement, many researchers turn to in silico modeling of protein structure to identify regions predicted to offer solvent-exposed conjugatable sites while conserving protein function. Here, using the aldehyde tag as our site-specific technology platform and human IgG1 antibody as our target protein, we demonstrate the power of taking an unbiased scanning approach instead. Scanning insertion of the human formylglycine generating enzyme (FGE) recognition sequence, LCTPSR, at each of the 436 positions in the light and heavy chain antibody constant regions followed by co-expression with FGE yielded a library of antibodies bearing an aldehyde functional group ready for conjugation. Each of the variants was expressed, purified, and conjugated to a cytotoxic payload using the Hydrazinyl Iso-Pictet-Spengler ligation to generate an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), which was analyzed in terms of conjugatability (assessed by drug-to-antibody ratio, DAR) and percent aggregate. We searched for insertion sites that could generate manufacturable ADCs, defined as those variants yielding reasonable antibody titers, DARs of ≥ 1.3, and ≥ 95% monomeric species. Through this process, we discovered 58 tag insertion sites that met these metrics, including 14 sites in the light chain, a location that had proved refractory to the placement of manufacturable tag sites using in silico modeling/rational approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.