ReviewAmerican journal of public health2018
Evaluating the Evidence on Sitting, Smoking, and Health: Is Sitting Really the New Smoking?
Review in American journal of public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Burden and predisposing factors of physical inactivity among adults in Africa: Systematic review and Meta-analysis.PloS one · 2026Pooled it
- The Meaning of Sedentary Behavior for People with Spinal Cord Injury: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Salutogenesis for health promotion: tensions and future directions for physical activity/active living research.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- A single day of reduced activity alters the next day's transcriptomic and metabolic exercise response.American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Article
- Numerate people are less likely to be biased by regular science reporting: the critical roles of scientific reasoning and causal misunderstanding.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025Article
- 50 years of harm reduction in Europe: high time for transformation.Harm reduction journal · 2025Review
- Article
- Correlates of sedentary behaviors among adults from eastern Poland.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Sedentarism and Chronic Health Problems.Korean journal of family medicine · 2024Article
- The prevalence of sedentary behavior among university students in Saudi Arabia.BMC public health · 2024Article
- What it takes to reduce sitting at work: a pilot study on the effectiveness and correlates of a multicomponent intervention.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2024Article
- A twin-driven analysis on early aging biomarkers and associations with sitting-time and physical activity.PloS one · 2024Article
- The association between different types of physical activity and smoking behavior.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Development and Evaluation of a Health Behavior Change Clinic in Primary Care: An Interdisciplinary Partnership.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2023Article
- Stepping Forward: A Scoping Review of Physical Activity in Osteoarthritis.The Journal of rheumatology · 2023Article
- Prophylactic role of olive fruit extract against cigarette smoke-induced oxidative stress in Sprague-Dawley rats.Cell stress & chaperones · 2022Article
- Evidence base of economic evaluations of workplace-based interventions reducing occupational sitting time: an integrative review.BMJ open · 2022Review
- Do skeletal muscle composition and gene expression as well as acute exercise-induced serum adaptations in older adults depend on fitness status?BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- Exploring Beliefs and Preferences for Reducing Sedentary Behavior Among Adults With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis or Knee Replacement.ACR open rheumatology · 2021Article
- Air pollution is not 'the new smoking': comparing the disease burden of air pollution and smoking across the globe, 1990-2017.Tobacco control · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sitting has frequently been equated with smoking, with some sources even suggesting that smoking is safer than sitting. This commentary highlights how sitting and smoking are not comparable. The most recent meta-analysis of sedentary behavior and health outcomes reported a hazard ratio of 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09, 1.41) for all-cause mortality. The relative risk (RR) of death from all causes among current smokers, compared with those who have never smoked, is 2.80 (95% CI = 2.72, 2.88) for men and 2.76 for women (95% CI = 2.69, 2.84). The risk is substantially higher for heavy smokers (> 40 cigarettes per day: RR = 4.08 [95% CI = 3.68, 4.52] for men, and 4.41 [95% CI = 3.70, 5.25] for women). These estimates correspond to absolute risk differences of more than 2000 excess deaths from any cause per 100 000 persons per year among the heaviest smokers compared with never smokers, versus 190 excess deaths per 100 000 persons per year when comparing people with the highest volume of sitting with the lowest. Conflicting or distorted information about health risks related to behavioral choices and environmental exposures can lead to confusion and public doubt with respect to health recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.