Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30252148›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2019

A Bayesian latent class approach for EHR-based phenotyping.

Rebecca A Hubbard, Jing Huang, Joanna Harton, Arman Oganisian, Grace Choi, Levon Utidjian, Ihuoma Eneli, L Charles Bailey, Yong Chen

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Automated Type 2 Diabetes Case and Control Identification from the MIMIC-IV Database.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rebecca A HubbardDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-0879-0994
Jing HuangDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Joanna HartonDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Arman OganisianDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Grace ChoiDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Levon UtidjianDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ihuoma EneliNationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
L Charles BaileyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Yong ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-0835-0788

Funding

Dynamic learning for post-vaccine event prediction using temporal information in VAERSR01AI130460 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI CHEN, YONG, TAO, CUI · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
A General Framework to Account for Outcome Reporting Bias in Systematic ReviewsR01LM012607 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN, YONG · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130460NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenotyping, ie, identification of patients possessing a characteristic of interest, is a fundamental task for research conducted using electronic health records. However, challenges to this task include imperfect sensitivity and specificity of clinical codes and inconsistent availability of more detailed data such as laboratory test results. Despite these challenges, most existing electronic health records-derived phenotypes are rule-based, consisting of a series of Boolean arguments informed by expert knowledge of the disease of interest and its coding. The objective of this paper is to introduce a Bayesian latent phenotyping approach that accounts for imperfect data elements and missing not at random missingness patterns that can be used when no gold-standard data are available. We conducted simulation studies to compare alternative phenotyping methods under different patterns of missingness and applied these approaches to a cohort of 68 265 children at elevated risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In simulation studies, the latent class approach had similar sensitivity to a rule-based approach (95.9% vs 91.9%) while substantially improving specificity (99.7% vs 90.8%). In the PEDSnet cohort, we found that biomarkers and clinical codes were strongly associated with latent T2DM status. The latent T2DM class was also strongly predictive of missingness in biomarkers. Glucose was missing in 83.4% of patients (odds ratio for latent T2DM status = 0.52) while hemoglobin A1c was missing in 91.2% (odds ratio for latent T2DM status = 0.03 ), suggesting missing not at random missingness. The latent phenotype approach may substantially improve on rule-based phenotyping.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremLatent Class AnalysisAdolescentChildClinical CodingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Electronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMalePhenotypeRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificityBayesianelectronic health recordslatent classmissing dataphenotype

Identifiers

PMID30252148
PMCPMC6519239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.