Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30252101›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2019

DNA methylation profiling is a method of choice for molecular verification of pediatric WNT-activated medulloblastomas.

Andrey Korshunov, Felix Sahm, Olga Zheludkova, Andrey Golanov, Damian Stichel, Daniel Schrimpf, Marina Ryzhova, Alexander Potapov, Antje Habel, Jochen Meyer and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Evolution of neurosurgical advances and nuances in medulloblastoma therapy.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrey KorshunovClinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology (G380), German Cancer Research Center and German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.
Felix SahmClinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology (G380), German Cancer Research Center and German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.
Olga ZheludkovaDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Russian Scientific Center of Radiology, Moscow, Russia.
Andrey GolanovDepartment of Neuroradiology, NN Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia.
Damian StichelClinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology (G380), German Cancer Research Center and German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.
Daniel SchrimpfClinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology (G380), German Cancer Research Center and German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marina RyzhovaDepartment of Neuropathology, NN Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia.
Alexander PotapovDepartment of Neuroradiology, NN Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia.
Antje HabelClinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology (G380), German Cancer Research Center and German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jochen MeyerClinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology (G380), German Cancer Research Center and German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter LichterHopp Children's Cancer Center at the National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
David T W JonesHopp Children's Cancer Center at the National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas von DeimlingClinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology (G380), German Cancer Research Center and German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefan M PfisterHopp Children's Cancer Center at the National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marcel KoolHopp Children's Cancer Center at the National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
National Center for Tumor Diseases · DEBurdenko Neurosurgery Institute · RUDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEHeidelberg University · DEResearch Center of Neurology · RUUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWingless-activated medulloblastoma (WNT MB) represents a well-characterized molecular variant accounting for 10-15% of all MB and is associated with a favorable clinical outcome. Patients with localized WNT MBs could benefit from de-intensification of combined treatment, which would require an accurate diagnosis of these tumors. However, despite the presence of molecular features related with a WNT MB signature (nuclear ß-catenin immunoexpression, CTNNB1 mutation, and monosomy 6), a prompt and reliable diagnostic verification of these tumors is not yet feasible.

methodsIn the current study, we analyzed 78 samples of WNT MB treated in a single institute through genome-wide DNA methylation and targeted next generation sequencing to elaborate an optimal method for WNT MB molecular verification.

resultsWe found that DNA methylation profiling discloses significant advantages for molecular diagnostic of WNT MB. All other "routine" methods applied, such as ß-catenin immunohistochemistry, CTNNB1 mutation analysis, and detection of monosomy 6, failed to identify all WNT MB cases. Survival analysis revealed that application of a reduced radiotherapy protocol for WNT MB treatment had no influence on patients' survival. Only one patient died due to local relapse but recurrent tumor was pathologically and molecularly diagnosed as a secondary glioblastoma.

conclusionsDNA methylation analysis should be considered as a method of choice for further clinically relevant stratification of WNT MB and for correct diagnosis of the recurrent tumors. WNT MB patients with localized disease could benefit from treatment de-intensification.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAdolescentBiomarkers, TumorCerebellar NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMedulloblastomaPrognosisRetrospective StudiesWnt ProteinsBiomarkers, TumorWnt Proteinsmedulloblastomamethylation analysisstratificationWNT activated

Identifiers

PMID30252101
PMCPMC6374763
OpenAlexW2894158895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.