Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30252079›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2018

Recommendations for Research and Practice to Improve Work Outcomes Among Cancer Survivors.

Janet S de Moor, Catherine M Alfano, Erin E Kent, Wynne E Norton, Diarmuid Coughlan, Megan C Roberts, Melvin Grimes, Cathy J Bradley

Open access · hybridAbstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
17.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Long-term work retention after treatment for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Housing Insecurity Among Patients With Cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Janet S de MoorDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.
Catherine M AlfanoAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA.
Erin E KentDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.
Wynne E NortonDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.
Diarmuid CoughlanDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.
Megan C RobertsDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.
Melvin GrimesDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.
Cathy J BradleyUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO.
National Cancer Institute · USAmerican Cancer Society · USUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major knowledge gaps limit the development and implementation of interventions to improve employment outcomes among people with cancer. To identify research priorities to improve employment outcomes after cancer, the National Cancer Institute sponsored the meeting "Evidence-Based Approaches for Optimizing Employment Outcomes among Cancer Survivors." This article describes research recommendations stemming from the meeting. At the patient level, longitudinal studies are needed to better understand how patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and their experiences at work shape employment outcomes. Interventions that mitigate the impact of cancer and its treatment on employment are critical. At the provider-level, future research is needed to characterize the extent to which physicians and other healthcare providers talk to their patients about employment concerns and how that information is used to inform care. Additionally, there is a need to test models of care delivery that support routine screening of employment concerns, the capture of employment outcomes in electronic health records, and the effective use of this information to improve care. At the employer level, evidence-based training programs are needed to prepare supervisors, managers, human resources staff, and occupational health professionals to address health issues in the workplace; and future interventions are needed to improve patient -employer communication and facilitate workplace accommodations. Importantly, research is needed that reflects the perspectives and priorities of patients and their families, providers and healthcare systems, and employers. Transdisciplinary partnerships and stakeholder engagement are essential to ensure that employment-focused interventions and policies are developed, implemented, and sustained in real-world healthcare delivery and workplace settings.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsEmploymentHealth Planning GuidelinesMedical OncologyQuality ImprovementWorkplaceDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareResearch

Identifiers

PMID30252079
PMCPMC6454422
OpenAlexW2893068644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.