Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30252031›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2019

The Impact of Vaccination and Prior Exposure on Stool Shedding of Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi in 6 Controlled Human Infection Studies.

Malick M Gibani, Merryn Voysey, Celina Jin, Claire Jones, Helena Thomaides-Brears, Elizabeth Jones, Philip Baker, Marcus Morgan, Alison Simmons, Melita A Gordon and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01405521 (Understanding Typhoid Disease After Vaccination), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01405521 phase2completednot on this map

Understanding Typhoid Disease After Vaccination: a Single Centre, Randomised, Doubleblind, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate M01ZH09 in a Healthy Adult Challenge Model, Using Ty21a Vaccine as a Positive Control.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2011 to 2022Enrolled99ConditionsTyphoid Fever, Enteric Fever, TyphoidArmsVaccine placebo (excipients only), Ty21a, M10ZH09 vaccine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Multivalent vaccines for invasiveInfection and immunity · 2026
    Review
  4. A defined microbiota mouse model forFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Typhoid fever.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Spatial and Genomic Data to Characterize Endemic Typhoid Transmission.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Tenacious Endemic Typhoid Fever in Samoa.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Generating the Evidence for Typhoid Vaccine Introduction: Considerations for Global Disease Burden Estimates and Vaccine Testing Through Human Challenge.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Malick M GibaniOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford.
Merryn VoyseyOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford.
Celina JinOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford.
Claire JonesOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford.
Helena Thomaides-BrearsOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford.
Elizabeth JonesOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford.
Philip BakerOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford.
Marcus MorganOxford University Hospitals, National Health Service Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Alison SimmonsMedical Research Council Human Immunology Unit, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Melita A GordonMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre.
Vincenzo CerundoloMedical Research Council Human Immunology Unit, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Virginia E PitzerDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Brian AngusOxford University Hospitals, National Health Service Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Myron M LevineCenter for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Thomas C DartonOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford.
Andrew J PollardOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford.
University of Oxford · GBNational Health Service · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USYale University · US

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2015-08-048Department of Health NIHR-RP-R3-12-026Medical Research Council MC_UU_00008/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00008/7Medical Research Council MC_UU_12010/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12010/7Medical Research Council MR/K021222/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 092661Wellcome Trust 106158/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShedding of Salmonella Typhi or Paratyphi in the stool or urine leads to contamination of food or water, which is a prerequisite for transmission of enteric fever. Currently, there are limited data on the effect of vaccination or prior exposure on stool shedding.

methodsSix Salmonella Typhi or Paratyphi human challenge studies were conducted between 2011 and 2017. Participants were either unvaccinated or vaccinated with 1 of 4 vaccines: Vi-polysaccharide (Vi-PS), Vi-tetanus-toxoid conjugate vaccine (Vi-TT), live oral Ty21a vaccine, or an experimental vaccine (M01ZH09). Daily stool cultures were collected for 14 days after challenge.

resultsThere were 4934 stool samples collected from 430 volunteers. Participants who received Vi-PS or Vi-TT shed less than unvaccinated participants (odds ratio [OR], 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-0.77; P = .010 and OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.19-0.91, P = .029 for Vi-PS and Vi-TT, respectively). Higher anti-Vi immunoglobulin G titers were associated with less shedding of S. Typhi (P < .0001). A nonsignificant reduction in shedding was associated with Ty21a vaccine (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.27-1.20; P = .140). Individuals previously exposed to S. Typhi shed less than previously unexposed individuals (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.1-0.8; P = .016). Shedding of S. Typhi was more common than S. Paratyphi.

conclusionsPrior vaccination with Vi vaccines, or natural infection, reduces onward transmission of S. Typhi. Field trials of Vi-TT should be designed to detect indirect protection, reflecting the consequence of reduced stool shedding observed in the human challenge model.

Indexed as

Bacterial SheddingSalmonella paratyphi ASalmonella typhiFecesHumansParatyphoid FeverTyphoid FeverTyphoid-Paratyphoid VaccinesTyphoid-Paratyphoid Vaccinesindirect effectsSalmonella Typhistool sheddingtyphoid conjugate vaccineVi-polysaccharide vaccine

Identifiers

PMID30252031
PMCPMC6452003
OpenAlexW2893777222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.