Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30251947›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of technology assessment in health care2018

PREFERENCES OF PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOR ATTRIBUTES OF INJECTABLE MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS TREATMENTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND FRANCE.

Christine Poulos, Elizabeth Kinter, Johan van Beek, Katrine Christensen, Joshua Posner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Quality of Life and Medication Adherence in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis-Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christine PoulosRTI Health Solutionscpoulos@rti.org.
Elizabeth KinterBiogen.
Johan van BeekBiogen.
Katrine ChristensenBiogen.
Joshua PosnerRTI Health Solutions.
Biogen (United States) · USRTI Health Solutions · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAdherence to injectable disease-modifying treatments in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) impacts outcomes and can be influenced by perceptions of treatment efficacy, side effects, injection frequency, and the duration of injection. This study aimed to quantify preferences for selected attributes of injectable treatments among individuals with MS in the United Kingdom and France.

methodsRespondents with a self-reported diagnosis of MS completed an online discrete-choice-experiment survey, consisting of a series of treatment-choice questions. Each choice question presented two hypothetical treatments, each with six attributes (years until disability progression, relapses in the next 4 years, injection time, injection frequency, flu-like symptoms (FLS), and injection-site reactions), each with various levels. Mixed-logit regression analysis was used to estimate preference weights for attribute levels and to calculate the relative importance of changes in treatment attributes (vertical distance between preference weights). Minimum acceptable efficacy estimates indicate improvement in efficacy that respondents would require in exchange for worsening injection frequency and FLS.

resultsIn both countries, 100 respondents completed the survey. In the United Kingdom and France, respectively, improving the time until disability progression from 2 to 4 years, reducing injection frequency from "daily" to "every 2 weeks", and reducing FLS from 3 days after every injection to none had a relative importance of 2.9 and 2.6, 3.0 and 3.5, and 2.5 and 3.1. Given the ranges included in the study, changes in these attributes were more important than most changes in other attributes assessed.

conclusionsReductions in the injection frequency of MS treatments and FLS can be as important to patients as improvements in treatment efficacy.

Indexed as

AdultChoice BehaviorDisease ProgressionDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleFranceHumansInjectionsMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisPatient PreferenceRecurrenceSocioeconomic FactorsTime FactorsUnited Kingdomadherencediscrete-choice experimentinjectable treatmentsmultiple sclerosisstated preference

Identifiers

PMID30251947
PMCPMC6190072
OpenAlexW2892828481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.