Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30251766›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2019

Reward-related regions form a preferentially coupled system at rest.

Jeremy F Huckins, Babatunde Adeyemo, Fran M Miezin, Jonathan D Power, Evan M Gordon, Timothy O Laumann, Todd F Heatherton, Steven E Petersen, William M Kelley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jeremy F HuckinsDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.ORCID 0000-0003-0106-7808
Babatunde AdeyemoDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Fran M MiezinDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Jonathan D PowerDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell College of Medicine, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-6922-100X
Evan M GordonVISN 17 Center of Excellence for Research on Returning War Veterans, Waco, Texas.
Timothy O LaumannDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Todd F HeathertonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Steven E PetersenDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.
William M KelleyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.

Funding

SOCIAL EFFECTS OF THREATS TO SELFR01MH059282 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI HAXBY, JAMES V · 2001 to 2020
$6.2M
Neural Predictors of Self-Regulation Failure and Success for Appetitive BehaviorR01DA022582 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI HAXBY, JAMES V · 2006 to 2017
$3.8M
Alcohol Marketing and Underage DrinkingR01AA021347 · NIAAA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI SARGENT, JAMES D. · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
Individual Differences in Resting State Connectivity and Self-Regulation FailureR21HL114092 · NHLBI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI HEATHERTON, TODD F · 2011 to 2012
$375k
Dartmouth Brain Imaging CenterNeukom Institute for Computational Science at Dartmouth CollegeNHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL114092NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA021347NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA022582NIH HHS AA021347NIH HHS DA022582NIH HHS HL114092NIH HHS MH059282NIH HHS NSF BCS-0746220NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH059282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging studies have implicated a set of striatal and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) regions that are commonly activated during reward processing tasks. Resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) studies have demonstrated that the human brain is organized into several functional systems that show strong temporal coherence in the absence of goal-directed tasks. Here we use seed-based and graph-theory RSFC approaches to characterize the systems-level organization of putative reward regions of at rest. Peaks of connectivity from seed-based RSFC patterns for the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) were used to identify candidate reward regions which were merged with a previously used set of regions (Power et al., 2011). Graph-theory was then used to determine system-level membership for all regions. Several regions previously implicated in reward-processing (NAcc, lateral and medial OFC, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex) comprised a distinct, preferentially coupled system. This RSFC system is stable across a range of connectivity thresholds and shares strong overlap with meta-analyses of task-based reward studies. This reward system shares between-system connectivity with systems implicated in cognitive control and self-regulation, including the fronto-parietal, cingulo-opercular, and default systems. Differences may exist in the pathways through which control systems interact with reward system components. Whereas NAcc is functionally connected to cingulo-opercular and default systems, OFC regions show stronger connectivity with the fronto-parietal system. We propose that future work may be able to interrogate group or individual differences in connectivity profiles using the regions delineated in this work to explore potential relationships to appetitive behaviors, self-regulation failure, and addiction.

Indexed as

ConnectomeRewardSelf-ControlAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNerve NetNucleus AccumbensPrefrontal CortexYoung Adultnetworknucleus accumbensorbitofrontal cortexresting-state fMRIrewardself-regulationsystem

Identifiers

PMID30251766
PMCPMC6865378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.