Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30251238›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied genetics2018

Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.

Hermenegildo Lucas Justino Chiaia, Elisa Peripolli, Rafael Medeiros de Oliveira Silva, Fabiele Loise Braga Feitosa, Marcos Vinícius Antunes de Lemos, Mariana Piatto Berton, Bianca Ferreira Olivieri, Rafael Espigolan, Rafael Lara Tonussi, Daniel Gustavo Mansan Gordo and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Hermenegildo Lucas Justino ChiaiaFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-000, Brazil. chiaia1@yahoo.com.br.
Elisa PeripolliFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-000, Brazil.
Rafael Medeiros de Oliveira SilvaFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-000, Brazil.
Fabiele Loise Braga FeitosaFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-000, Brazil.
Marcos Vinícius Antunes de LemosFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-000, Brazil.
Mariana Piatto BertonFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-000, Brazil.
Bianca Ferreira OlivieriFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-000, Brazil.
Rafael EspigolanFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-000, Brazil.
Rafael Lara TonussiFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-000, Brazil.
Daniel Gustavo Mansan GordoFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-000, Brazil.
Lucia Galvão de AlbuquerqueFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-000, Brazil.
Henrique Nunes de OliveiraFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-000, Brazil.
Adrielle Mathias FerrinhoFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, USP, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Lenise Freitas MuellerFaculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, USP, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Sabrina KluskaFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-000, Brazil.
Humberto TonhatiFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-000, Brazil.
Angélica Simone Cravo PereiraFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, USP, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Ignacio AguilarInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Fernando BaldiFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-000, Brazil.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2009/16118-5Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2011/2141-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the predictive ability of SNP-BLUP model using different pseudo-phenotypes such as phenotype adjusted for fixed effects, estimated breeding value, and genomic estimated breeding value, using simulated and real data for beef FA profile of Nelore cattle finished in feedlot. A pedigree with phenotypes and genotypes of 10,000 animals were simulated, considering 50% of multiple sires in the pedigree. Regarding to phenotypes, two traits were simulated, one with high heritability (0.58), another with low heritability (0.13). Ten replicates were performed for each trait and results were averaged among replicates. A historical population was created from generation zero to 2020, with a constant size of 2000 animals (from generation zero to 1000) to produce different levels of linkage disequilibrium (LD). Therefore, there was a gradual reduction in the number of animals (from 2000 to 600), producing a "bottleneck effect" and consequently, genetic drift and LD starting in the generation 1001 to 2020. A total of 335,000 markers (with MAF greater or equal to 0.02) and 1000 QTL were randomly selected from the last generation of the historical population to generate genotypic data for the test population. The phenotypes were computed as the sum of the QTL effects and an error term sampled from a normal distribution with zero mean and variance equal to 0.88. For simulated data, 4000 animals of the generations 7, 8, and 9 (with genotype and phenotype) were used as training population, and 1000 animals of the last generation (10) were used as validation population. A total of 937 Nelore bulls with phenotype for fatty acid profiles (Sum of saturated, monounsaturated, omega 3, omega 6, ratio of polyunsaturated and saturated and polyunsaturated fatty acid profile) were genotyped using the Illumina BovineHD BeadChip (Illumina, San Diego, CA) with 777,962 SNP. To compare the accuracy and bias of direct genomic value (DGV) for different pseudo-phenotypes, the correlation between true breeding value (TBV) or DGV with pseudo-phenotypes and linear regression coefficient of the pseudo-phenotypes on TBV for simulated data or DGV for real data, respectively. For simulated data, the correlations between DGV and TBV for high heritability traits were higher than obtained with low heritability traits. For simulated and real data, the prediction ability was higher for GEBV than for Yc and EBV. For simulated data, the regression coefficient estimates (b

Indexed as

Quantitative Trait, HeritableAnimalsBreedingCattleComputer SimulationFatty AcidsGenomicsGenotypeLinkage DisequilibriumMaleModels, GeneticPedigreePhenotypeQuantitative Trait LociRed MeatFatty AcidsBos indicusGenomic predictionLipid profileSingle-stepSNP-BLUP

Identifiers

PMID30251238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.