Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30251208›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgery2019

Open Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Network Meta-analysis Comparing Self-Gripping Mesh, Suture Fixation, and Glue Fixation.

Emanuele Rausa, Emanuele Asti, Michael Eamon Kelly, Alberto Aiolfi, Andrea Lovece, Gianluca Bonitta, Luigi Bonavina

Abstract readComparative StudySystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Inguinal hernia repair with the trabucco technique: A multicenter analysis with 5-year follow-up.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Heliyon · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emanuele RausaDivision of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy. emarausa@yahoo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6780-1783
Emanuele AstiDivision of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Michael Eamon KellyDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Alberto AiolfiDivision of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Andrea LoveceDivision of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Gianluca BonittaDivision of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Luigi BonavinaDivision of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most troublesome complications of inguinal hernia repair are recurrent herniation and chronic pain. A multitude of technological products dedicated to abdominal wall surgery, such as self-gripping mesh (SGM) and glue fixation (GF), were introduced in alternative to suture fixation (SF) in the attempt to lower the postoperative complication rates. We conducted an electronic systematic search using MEDLINE databases that compared postoperative pain and short- and long-term surgical complications after SGM or GF and SF in open inguinal hernia repair. Twenty-eight randomized controlled trials totaling 5495 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this network meta-analysis. SGM and GF did not show better outcomes in either short- or long-term complications compared to SF. Patients in the SGM group showed significantly more pain at day 1 compared to those in the GF group (VAS score pain mean difference: - 5.2 Crl - 11.0; - 1.2). The relative risk (RR) of developing a surgical site infection (RR 0.83; Crl 0.50-1.32), hematoma (RR 1.9; Crl 0.35-11.2), and seroma (RR 1.81; Crl 0.54-6.53) was similar in SGM and GF groups. Both the SGM and GF had a significantly shorter operative time mean difference (1.70; Crl - 1.80; 5.3) compared to SF. Chronic pain and hernia recurrence did not statistically differ at 1 year (RR 0.63; Crl 0.36-1.12; RR 1.5; Crl 0.52-4.71, respectively) between SGM and GF. Methods of inguinal hernia repair are evolving, but there remains no superiority in terms of mesh fixation. Ultimately, patient's preference and surgeon's expertise should still lead the choice about the fixation method.

Indexed as

Chronic PainHernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyHumansPostoperative PainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceSurgical MeshSuturesSuture TechniquesTissue AdhesivesTissue Adhesives

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.