Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30251203›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2018

Current trends in tendinopathy: consensus of the ESSKA basic science committee. Part II: treatment options.

F Abat, H Alfredson, M Cucchiarini, H Madry, A Marmotti, C Mouton, J M Oliveira, H Pereira, G M Peretti, C Spang and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06939491 (Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Electrolysis Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06939491 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Electrolysis Therapy (USGET) vs. Sham USGET on Patients With Patellar Tendinopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) Assessing the Effects on Pain, Function, and Tendon Structure Including MRI and Shear-wave Elastography Ultrasound Imaging

TypeinterventionalSponsorGymna UniphyRan2024 to 2026Enrolled74ConditionsPatellar Tendinopathy / Jumpers KneeArmsUltrasound guided electrolysis therapy, Sham Electrolysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Shaping experimental orthopaedics.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 12 institutions in 10 countries.

F AbatDepartment of Sports Orthopaedics, ReSport Clinic, Passeig Fabra i Puig 47, 08030, Barcelona, Spain. abat@resportclinic.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5711-6640
H AlfredsonSports Medicine Unit, University of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden.
M CucchiariniMolecular Biology, Center of Experimental Orthopaedics, Saarland University Medical Center, Kirrbergerstr. Bldg 37, D-66421, Homburg, Saar, Germany.
H MadryLehrstuhl für Experimentelle Orthopädie und Arthroseforschung, Universität des Saarlandes, Gebäude 37, Kirrbergerstr. 1, D-66421, Homburg, Germany.
A MarmottiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano,University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
C MoutonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Clinique d'Eich-Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, 76, rue d'Eich, L-1460, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
J M Oliveira3B's Research Group - Biomaterials, Biodegradables and Biomimetics, University of Minho, Headquarters of the European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, AvePark, Zona Industrial da Gandra, 4805-017, Barco GMR, Portugal.
H Pereira3B's Research Group - Biomaterials, Biodegradables and Biomimetics, University of Minho, Headquarters of the European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, AvePark, Zona Industrial da Gandra, 4805-017, Barco GMR, Portugal.
G M PerettiIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
C SpangDepartment of Integrative Medical Biology, Anatomy Section, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
J StephenFortius Clinic, 17 Fitzhardinge St, London, W1H 6EQ, UK.
C J A van BergenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Amphia Hospital Breda, Breda, The Netherlands.
L de GirolamoOrthopaedic Biotechnology Laboratory, Orthopaedic Institute Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Barco (Belgium) · BEAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLCentre Hospitalier de Luxembourg · LUFortius Clinic · GBIstituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · ITLondon Clinic · GBOspedale San Luigi Gonzaga · ITPuigvert Foundation · ESSaarland University · DEUmeå University · SEUniversitätsklinikum des Saarlandes · DEUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of painful chronic tendinopathy is challenging. Multiple non-invasive and tendon-invasive methods are used. When traditional non-invasive treatments fail, the injections of platelet-rich plasma autologous blood or cortisone have become increasingly favored. However, there is little scientific evidence from human studies supporting injection treatment. As the last resort, intra- or peritendinous open or endoscopic surgery are employed even though these also show varying results. This ESSKA basic science committee current concepts review follows the first part on the biology, biomechanics and anatomy of tendinopathies, to provide a comprehensive overview of the latest treatment options for tendinopathy as reported in the literature.

Identifiers

PMID30251203
PMCPMC6153202
OpenAlexW2890296088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.