Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30251187›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2018

Human Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation Training: Time Beats Quantity.

M Muntaseer Mahfuz, Michael C Schubert, William V C Figtree, Christopher J Todd, Americo A Migliaccio

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03913663 (A Model Based Study for Gait in Heminglect Patient Pre and Post Vestibul-ocular Rehabilitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03913663 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Model Based Study for Gait in Heminglect Patient Pre and Post Vestibul-ocular Rehabilitation

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeni-Suef UniversityRan2019 to 2019Enrolled40ConditionsHemiplegic GaitArmsvestibuloocular training, regular exercise training for hemiplegic patients
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Visual information potentiates incremental VOR adaptation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Human Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation Reduces when Training Demand Variability Increases.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Retinal Image Slip Must Pass the Threshold for Human Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M Muntaseer MahfuzBalance and Vision Laboratory, Neuroscience Research Australia, Cnr Barker Street & Easy Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.
Michael C SchubertLaboratory of Vestibular NeuroAdaptation, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
William V C FigtreeBalance and Vision Laboratory, Neuroscience Research Australia, Cnr Barker Street & Easy Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.
Christopher J ToddBalance and Vision Laboratory, Neuroscience Research Australia, Cnr Barker Street & Easy Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.
Americo A MigliaccioBalance and Vision Laboratory, Neuroscience Research Australia, Cnr Barker Street & Easy Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia. a.migliaccio@neura.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8547-6590

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) is the main gaze stabilising system during rapid head movements. The VOR is highly plastic and its gain (eye/head velocity) can be increased via training that induces an incrementally increasing retinal image slip error signal to drive VOR adaptation. Using the unilateral incremental VOR adaptation technique and horizontal active head impulses as the vestibular stimulus, we sought to determine the factors important for VOR adaptation including: the total training time, ratio and number of head impulses to each side (adapting and non-adapting sides; the adapting side was pseudo-randomised left or right) and exposure time to the visual target during each head impulse. We tested 11 normal subjects, each over 5 separate sessions and training protocols. The basic training protocol (protocol one) consisted of unilateral incremental VOR adaptation training lasting 15 min with the ratio of head impulses to each side 1:1. Each protocol varied from the basic. For protocol two, the ratio of impulses were in favour of the adapting side by 2:1. For protocol three, all head impulses were towards the adapting side and the training only lasted 7.5 min. For protocol four, all impulses were towards the adapting side and lasted 15 min. For protocol five, all head impulses were to the adapting side and the exposure time to the visual target during each impulse was doubled. We measured the active and passive VOR gains before and after the training. Albeit with small sample size, our data suggest that the total training time and the visual target exposure time for each head impulse affected adaptation, whereas the total number and repetition rate of head impulses did not. These data have implications for vestibular rehabilitation, suggesting that quality and duration of VOR adaptation exercises are more important than rapid repetition of exercises.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalReflex, Vestibulo-OcularAdultHead Impulse TestHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysical Therapy ModalitiesVestibular DiseasesHead impulsesOptimising training parametersVestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR)VOR adaptationVOR training

Identifiers

PMID30251187
PMCPMC6249163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.