Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30251170›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2019

Development and pilot testing of a leaflet informing women with breast cancer about genomic testing for polygenic risk.

Rajneesh Kaur, Bettina Meiser, Tatiane Yanes, Mary-Anne Young, Kristine Barlow-Stewart, Tony Roscioli, Sian Smith, Paul A James

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rajneesh KaurPsychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. rajneesh.kaur@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4406-4327
Bettina MeiserPsychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Tatiane YanesPsychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Mary-Anne YoungGenome.One, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
Kristine Barlow-StewartSydney Medical School Northern, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Tony RoscioliDepartment of Medical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Sian SmithPsychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Paul A JamesFamilial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inclusion of polygenic risk scores in breast cancer risk prediction models provides a more personalised and accurate prediction of breast cancer risk for women with and without breast cancer, who would otherwise receive negative results from traditional testing of moderate- and high-risk genes. This study aimed to develop, and pilot test a leaflet with a sample of women participating in a large prospective cohort study. The leaflet aimed to provide information about polygenic risk to assist women to decide whether or not to learn results from genomic testing for common risk variants associated with breast cancer risk. A prototype of the leaflet was developed based on published literature and with the expertise from a multidisciplinary team. The acceptability of the leaflet was assessed by self-report questionnaire among 29 women participating in the prospective cohort study. More than 80% participants stated that the leaflet was clear, informative and easy to understand and increased their understanding of polygenic risk information. While low to moderate levels of distress/worry were reported around implications of the test results for the next generation, 71% felt reassured and agreed that the information provided in the leaflet had helped them cope. Pilot-test results indicate the leaflet is acceptable to the participants and the revised leaflet can be used as an information tool for women undergoing genomic testing. This educational leaflet will become a useful information source to meet the information needs of women undergoing genomic testing.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalGenetic TestingAdultAgedAustraliaBreast NeoplasmsComprehensionDecision MakingFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMiddle AgedNeoplastic Syndromes, HereditaryPatient Education as TopicPilot ProjectsBreast cancerGenomic testingLeafletPolygenic risk score

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.