Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30251135›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2019

Robotic retro-rectus repair of parastomal hernias.

Victor Maciel, Wilmer Mata, Gabriel Arevalo, Marianna Zeichen, Timothy Glass

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. End-colostomy parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review on laparoscopic and robotic approaches.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Robotic Sugarbaker parastomal hernia repair: technique and outcomes.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Victor MacielBroward Surgical Specialists, Tamarac, FL, USA. vmacielmd@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4589-1751
Wilmer MataSt. Vincent Hospital Surgery Department and General Surgery Residency program, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Gabriel ArevaloSt. Vincent Hospital Surgery Department and General Surgery Residency program, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Marianna ZeichenIndiana University General Surgery Residency Program, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Timothy GlassSt. Vincent Hospital Surgery Department and General Surgery Residency program, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
St Vincent Hospital · USBroward Health · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo present our technique of robotic retrorectus parastomal hernia repair.

backgroundParastomal hernias represent a significant problem with high recurrence and long-term complications. An estimated of 120,000 new stomas are created per year with a prevalence of up to 800,000 patients in the U.S. 40-60% of these ostomies will never be reversed. Parastomal hernias cause skin breakdown and make adherence of ostomy appliances difficult, creating the need for frequent bag exchanges. They can also cause pain, bowel obstruction and bowel incarceration or strangulation. All of these factors affect quality of life and represent a significant burden to our health care system. There is no definitive gold-standard technique to repair parastomal hernias. The use of prosthesis decreases the recurrence rates, yet using prosthetic material can result in long-term complications. Surgeons have developed techniques of pre-peritoneal mesh placement to provide long-lasting repairs and at the same time prevent complications associated with the mesh. We believe that a robotic retro-rectus approach provides a secure repair and avoids leaving prosthetic material in the abdominal cavity at the same time.

methodsA three-arm technique is used, inserting ports opposite to the target anatomy. Hernia contents are reduced protecting the ostomy loop and mesentery. The contralateral retro-rectus space is entered and this space is developed extensively across the midline and around the ostomy. The hernia defect is approximated. Concomitant ventral hernias are also repaired. A polypropylene mesh with a keyhole is used and wide coverage is ensured in all directions. The leaflets of the mesh are stitched together and the mesh is sutured to the abdominal wall. Finally, the retro-rectus space is closed.

resultsWe have performed this technique in two patients safely and at 1-year follow-up there were no recurrences in either. On conclusion, this is a novel minimally invasive technique to repair parastomal hernias that provides wide coverage of the defect and avoids leaving mesh intraperitoneally.

Indexed as

Surgical StomasAgedFemaleHerniorrhaphyHumansIncisional HerniaMaleRectumRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeHerniaKeyholeParastomal herniaPeristomal herniaRetrorectusRoboticSublay

Identifiers

PMID30251135
OpenAlexW2893008343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.