Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30251072›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2018

Standards for Neurologic Critical Care Units: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from The Neurocritical Care Society.

Asma M Moheet, Sarah L Livesay, Tamer Abdelhak, Thomas P Bleck, Theresa Human, Navaz Karanjia, Amanda Lamer-Rosen, Joshua Medow, Paul A Nyquist, Axel Rosengart and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readEditorial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Asma M MoheetCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. asma.moheet@csmc.edu.
Sarah L LivesayRush University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Tamer AbdelhakSpectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Thomas P BleckRush University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Theresa HumanWashington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Navaz KaranjiaUniversity of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Amanda Lamer-RosenCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Joshua MedowSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Paul A NyquistJohns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Axel RosengartCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Wade SmithUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Michel T TorbeyThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Cherylee W J ChangThe Queen's Medical Center, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurocritical care is a distinct subspecialty focusing on the optimal management of acutely ill patients with life-threatening neurologic and neurosurgical disease or with life-threatening neurologic manifestations of systemic disease. Care by expert healthcare providers to optimize neurologic recovery is necessary. Given the lack of an organizational framework and criteria for the development and maintenance of neurological critical care units (NCCUs), this document is put forth by the Neurocritical Care Society (NCS). Recommended organizational structure, personnel and processes necessary to develop a successful neurocritical care program are outlined. Methods: Under the direction of NCS Executive Leadership, a multidisciplinary writing group of NCS members was formed. After an iterative process, a framework was proposed and approved by members of the writing group. A draft was then written, which was reviewed by the NCS Quality Committee and NCS Guidelines Committee, members at large, and posted for public comment. Feedback was formally collated, reviewed and incorporated into the final document which was subsequently approved by the NCS Board of Directors.

Indexed as

Critical CareHumansNervous System DiseasesNeurologyPersonnel, HospitalPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality ImprovementSocieties, MedicalConsensusCritical careCritical care unitIntensive careIntensive care unitNeurocritical careNeurocritical care unitPerformance improvementQualityQuality improvementQuality indicatorStandards

Identifiers

PMID30251072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.