ArticleEcoHealth2018
Drivers of Physicians' Engagement in Addressing Eco-health Problems.
Article in EcoHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Awareness of endocrine-disrupting chemicals among medical students and physicians: a cross-sectional study.Medical education online · 2025Article
- Frontline clinic perspectives on climate change, human health, and resilience: a national cross-sectional survey.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Article
- Role of Health Professionals Regarding the Impact of Climate Change on Health-An Exploratory Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Physicians' Performance in China: A Cross-Level Mediation Model.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physicians are in a unique position to be first-hand observers of the effects of environmental factors on population health. As a source of information which is highly trusted, they are also well-suited to raise awareness about the linkages between ecosystem and population health. Yet, current clinical practice in many parts of the world rarely includes environmental health assessments and patient education. The empirical evidence on the reasons for this lack of engagement is limited by the small number of studies published, its narrow geographical scope and the dearth of multivariate statistical analysis. This study used a mixed-methods approach to investigate the determinants of whether physicians at selected hospitals in Thailand assess the environmental history of their patients and provide environmental health advice. Using an ordered logistic regression model, it was found that physicians' engagement was associated with their knowledge, personal motivation, perception of being supported by senior staff and ability to discuss with colleagues. According to key informants, possible remedies for the observed lack of physicians' engagement include revisions of the medical school curriculum, clear strategies for addressing eco-health linkages in the clinical context at the national and hospital level, and better cooperation between relevant government institutions in Thailand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30250980What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.