Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30250853›Full record

ArticleMedical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal2018

Teleophthalmology Support for Primary Care Diagnosis and Management.

Elmar Torres, Paulo H Morales, Olimpio J N V Bittar, Nacime S Mansur, Solange R Salomão, Rubens Jr Belfort

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tele-ophthalmology: Need of the hour.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elmar TorresDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Paulo H MoralesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Olimpio J N V BittarHealth State Secretary, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Nacime S MansurDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Solange R SalomãoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rubens Jr BelfortDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRInstituto da Visão · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate a healthcare strategy based on teleophthalmology for diagnosis and management of primary healthcare users. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted to review the medical records of patients from January 2013 to December 2014 from primary care units in the city of São Paulo. The units referred patients, who had diabetes or high blood pressure, and were users of chloroquine compounds, for a fundus examination. The images were sent to a reading center for review, diagnosis, and patient referrals. From 9173 analyzed patients, 570 (6.2%) were excluded because of poor image quality. Of the remaining patients, 4933 (57.3%) had diabetes, 7242 (84,2%) systemic hypertension, and 113 (1.3%) used chloroquine. Of these, 989 (11.5%) patients needed ophthalmologic treatment. The most frequently prescribed treatments were cataract extraction in 692 (70%) of 989 and photocoagulation in 245 (24.8%) of 989 cases. Overall, cataract extraction was indicated in 692 (8%) of 8603 cases and photocoagulation in 245 (2.8%) of 8603 cases. When only patients with diabetes were considered, the indication for photocoagulation increased to 4.5%.The results showed that non-medical professionals could produce good-quality ocular images for screening of ocular diseases in most cases; only 6.2% of ocular images did not meet quality requirements. Most patients referred for fundus examination did not need a specific treatment, indicating that this system could be an inexpensive and reliable tool for use in developing countries.

Indexed as

ChloroquineDiabetesDiagnosisHypertensionPrimary CareTeleophthalmology

Identifiers

PMID30250853
PMCPMC6146236
OpenAlexW2964821274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.