Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30250852›Full record

ArticleMedical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal2018

A Modified Small-Incision Lenticule Intrastromal Keratoplasty (sLIKE) for the Correction of High Hyperopia: A Description of a New Surgical Technique and Comparison to Lenticule Intrastromal Keratoplasty (LIKE).

Majid Moshirfar, Tirth J Shah, Maliha Masud, Trey Fanning, Steven H Linn, Yasmyne Ronquillo, Phillip C Sr Hoopes

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Majid MoshirfarJohn A. Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, United States.
Tirth J ShahDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Maliha MasudUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States.
Trey FanningHDR Research Center, Hoopes Vision, 11820 S. State Street Suite #200, Draper, UT 84020, United States.
Steven H LinnHDR Research Center, Hoopes Vision, 11820 S. State Street Suite #200, Draper, UT 84020, United States.
Yasmyne RonquilloHDR Research Center, Hoopes Vision, 11820 S. State Street Suite #200, Draper, UT 84020, United States.
Phillip C Sr HoopesHDR Research Center, Hoopes Vision, 11820 S. State Street Suite #200, Draper, UT 84020, United States.
Minnesota Lions Eye Bank · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with high hyperopia are generally confined to either spectacle wear or contact lenses as a primary means of refractive correction. For this patient population, the surgical corrective methods, such as hyperopic laser assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) are imperfect options due to induction of higher-order aberrations, optical regression, and loss of best corrected distance visual acuity. Recently, there has been growing interest in lenticule implantation underneath a flap via lenticule intrastromal keratoplasty (LIKE) for high hyperopia correction (+3 diopters to +10 diopters). We instead propose a modified surgical technique (small-incision lenticule intrastromal keratoplasty, sLIKE), in which the lenticule is implanted inside an intrastromal pocket thereby causing less injury to the subbasal nerve plexus injury, less postoperative dry eye symptoms, less reduction in biomechanical strength, and lower chances for epithelial ingrowth. We provide an overview of these novel surgical techniques to treat high hyperopia, and compare the associated advantages and disadvantages. In addition, we will discuss the enhancement options and methods of optimization for both surgical techniques.

Indexed as

HyperopiaHyperopia treatmentlenticule implantationLenticule Intrastromal Keratoplasty (LIKE)Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE)Small-Incision Lenticule Intrastromal Keratoplasty (sLIKE)

Identifiers

PMID30250852
PMCPMC6146242
OpenAlexW2981288303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.