ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2018
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning reshapes the paradigm of nanomedicine research.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Structure-Based Prediction of Molecular Interactions for Stabilizing Volatile Drugs.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Application of Computing as a High-Practicability and -Efficiency Auxiliary Tool in Nanodrugs Discovery.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- A deep learning model for drug screening and evaluation in bladder cancer organoids.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Topical Gel of Vitamin A Solid Lipid Nanoparticles: A Hopeful Promise as a Dermal Delivery System.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2021Article
- Describing chain-like assembly of ethoxygroup-functionalized organic molecules on Au(111) using high-throughput simulations.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Deep learning-based predictive identification of neural stem cell differentiation.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accuracy of current efficacy judgment methods for nanoformulated drug remains unstable due to the interference of nanocarriers. Herein,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.