ArticleOncology letters2018
The synergistic effect of propofol and ulinastatin suppressed the viability of the human lung adenocarcinoma epithelial A549 cell line.
Article in Oncology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ulinastatin attenuates renal fibrosis by regulating AMPK/HIF-1α signaling pathway-mediated glycolysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- NEIL3 may act as a potential prognostic biomarker for lung adenocarcinoma.Cancer cell international · 2021Article
- A preliminary study of influences of hydroxyethyl starch combined with ulinastatin on degree of edema in newborns with capillary leak syndrome.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Dichloroacetate enhances the antitumor effect of pirarubicin via regulating the ROS-JNK signaling pathway in liver cancer cells.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ulinastatin and propofol (PPF) are recognized for their anticancer properties. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the synergistic antitumor effect of PPF followed by ulinastatin against A549 cells. In MTT assays, PPF (10, 20 and 30 µM) followed by 200 U/ml ulinastatin was more effective at inhibiting A549 cell viability compared with PPF (10, 20 and 30 µM) or 200 U/ml ulinastatin. PPF (10, 20 and 30 µM) followed by 200 U/ml ulinastatin treatments synergistically increased the number of S cells and synergistically reduced the number of G2/M cells associated with PPF stimulation in a dose-dependent manner. Western blot analysis demonstrated that the antitumor effect of PPF followed by 200 U/ml ulinastatin treatments were associated with the downregulated expression of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 phosphorylation (p-ERK1/2) and matrix metalloproteinases 2 (MMP-2). In conclusion, these data demonstrated that PPF (20 and 30 µM) followed by 200 U/ml ulinastatin treatments synergistically stimulated a significant proportion of A549 cells in S phase. Furthermore, the combination synergistically reduced a significant proportion of A549 cells in G2/M phase and synergistically suppressed the viability of A549 cells, which was possibly related regulation of the expression of p-ERK1/2 and MMP-2 in A549 cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.