Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30250534›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2018

Role of gastroscopic biopsy of gastric ulcer margins and healed sites in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer: A clinical controlled study of 513 cases.

Jing-Jing Wan, Su-Juan Fei, Sheng-Xiang Lv, Shu-Tang Han, Xing-Gang Ma, Dong-Sheng Xu, Hong-Mei Chen, Ju Zhang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Serum CXCL13 and PECAM-1 can be used as diagnostic and prognostic markers in elderly patients with gastric cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jing-Jing WanDigestive Endoscopy Center, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, P.R. China.
Su-Juan FeiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Xuzhou Medical University Affiliated Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221004, P.R. China.
Sheng-Xiang LvDepartment of Gastroenterology, Huaian Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Huai'an, Jiangsu 223002, P.R. China.
Shu-Tang HanDigestive Endoscopy Center, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, P.R. China.
Xing-Gang MaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Huaian Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Huai'an, Jiangsu 223002, P.R. China.
Dong-Sheng XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Huaian Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Huai'an, Jiangsu 223002, P.R. China.
Hong-Mei ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Huaian Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Huai'an, Jiangsu 223002, P.R. China.
Ju ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Huaian Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Huai'an, Jiangsu 223002, P.R. China.
Xuzhou Medical College · CNNanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present case study aimed to evaluate the effect of gastroscopic biopsy of gastric ulcer margins and healed sites in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer. A total of 513 patients who were diagnosed with gastric ulcers using gastroscopy between January 1999 and December 2013 were included in the present study and were divided into either the experimental or the control group. In the control group, samples were only taken from the ulcer margin, whereas in the experimental group samples were taken from the ulcer margin and from the ulcer base. In the experimental group, a routine biopsy of the ulcer margin was performed on first examination, and recheck by gastroscopy was performed from the second week. For ulcers that remained unhealed, a biopsy of the ulcer margin was subsequently conducted; however, for healed or almost healed ulcers, a biopsy of the ulcer base was conducted. The duration of follow-up by gastroscopy ranged between 1 week and 24 months. For the control group, a biopsy of the ulcer margin was conducted using the conventional method. The detection rate of the experimental group was 3.88% (9/232), with 4 cases of gastric cancer confirmed from examinations of the ulcer base. The detection rate of the control group was 1.07% (3/281), which was significantly decreased compared with that of the experimental group (P=0.0345). Overall, patients who underwent regular follow-up gastroscopy following treatment exhibited a markedly increased detection rate of early gastric cancer, suggesting that early cancer may occur in healed gastric ulcer sites.

Indexed as

early gastric cancergastric ulcergastroscopic biopsygastroscopyhealed sites

Identifiers

PMID30250534
PMCPMC6144944
OpenAlexW2884708221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.