Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30250459›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018

Antagonistic Potential of Fluorescent Pseudomonads Colonizing Wheat Heads Against Mycotoxin Producing Alternaria and Fusaria.

Thomas Müller, Silke Ruppel, Undine Behrendt, Peter Lentzsch, Marina E H Müller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Effect ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. NovelBiotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comprehensive review on patulin andFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Minimal impacts on the wheat microbiome whenFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Quantifying the Role of Ground Beetles for the Dispersal ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. Co-Cultivation ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas MüllerLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany.
Silke RuppelLeibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Großbeeren, Germany.
Undine BehrendtLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany.
Peter LentzschLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany.
Marina E H MüllerLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany.
Berlin Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research · DELeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research · DELeibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural control of phytopathogenic microorganisms is assumed as a priority function of the commensal plant microbiota. In this study, the suitability of fluorescent pseudomonads in the phyllosphere of crop plants as natural control agents was evaluated. Under field conditions, ears of winter wheat were found to be colonized with high consistency and at a high density by pseudomonads at the late milk dough stage. Isolates of these bacteria were evaluated for their potential to protect the plants from phytopathogenic

Indexed as

agricultureAlternariaFusariummycotoxinsnatural controlplant microbiotaPseudomonaswheat

Identifiers

PMID30250459
PMCPMC6139315
OpenAlexW2891090492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.