ArticleVeterinary world2018
Mixing two different propolis samples potentiates their antimicrobial activity and wound healing property: A novel approach in wound healing and infection.
Article in Veterinary world, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of propolis for skin wound healing: systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of dermatological research · 2023Pooled it
- Evaluation of Propolis and Diclofenac Sodium Eye Drops for Animals: Physicochemical Properties and In Vitro Biological Activity.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Antioxidant Properties and Biological Effects of a Novel Combined Barberry Root-Propolis Extract on HEK293T Cells.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Natural agents as wound-healing promoters.Inflammopharmacology · 2024Review
- Therapeutic Management of Malignant Wounds: An Update.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024Review
- Recent advances and opportunities related to the use of bee products in food processing.Food science & nutrition · 2023Review
- Mixing Propolis from Different Apiaries and Harvesting Years: Towards Propolis Standardization?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Propolis: An update on its chemistry and pharmacological applications.Chinese medicine · 2022Review
- Antioxidant activity and protective effect of propolis against carbon tetrachloride-induced liver and kidney injury by modulation of oxidative parameters.Veterinary world · 2021Article
- Antigonococcal Activity of (+)-Medicarpin.ACS omega · 2021Article
- Propolis ethanolic extract has double-faceSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2021Article
- Honey Bee Products: Preclinical and Clinical Studies of Their Anti-inflammatory and Immunomodulatory Properties.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Review
- Propolis particles incorporated in aqueous formulations with enhanced antibacterial performance.Food hydrocolloids for health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe study aimed to investigate whether mixing two different propolis samples can potentiate their biological activity. This hypothesis was tested by studying the effect of mixed propolis on microbial growth and wound healing and compared with the effect of each propolis individually. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe effect of mixing two different propolis extracts (A and B) collected from different locations in Iraq on
resultsPropolis A was more potent than propolis B extracts to inhibit the growth of
conclusionThis study demonstrates for the first time that mixing different propolis samples possesses a higher antimicrobial activity and higher wound healing property than individual propolis. This approach could pave the way for the development of more effective antimicrobials and wound healing agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.