Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30250359›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2018

Seroprevalence of brucellosis in small ruminants in organized and unorganized sectors of Gujarat state, India.

A Kanani, S Dabhi, Y Patel, V Chandra, O R Vinodh Kumar, R Shome

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Epidemiology of Brucellosis in Small Ruminants of Rural and Peri-Urban Areas of Multan, Pakistan.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Serological and molecular prevalence ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Seromonitoring of brucellosis in goats and sheep slaughtered at an abattoir in Kampala, Uganda.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Seroprevalence of Brucellosis in goats in some selected areas of Bangladesh.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Risk factors forInfection ecology & epidemiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A KananiOffice of Deputy Director of Animal Husbandry, F.M.D. Typing Scheme, Polytechnic Campus, Ambawadi, Ahmedabad - 380 015, Gujarat, India.
S DabhiOffice of Deputy Director of Animal Husbandry, F.M.D. Typing Scheme, Polytechnic Campus, Ambawadi, Ahmedabad - 380 015, Gujarat, India.
Y PatelDepartment of Biomedical Technology, University School of Science, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat.
V ChandraOffice of Deputy Director of Animal Husbandry, F.M.D. Typing Scheme, Polytechnic Campus, Ambawadi, Ahmedabad - 380 015, Gujarat, India.
O R Vinodh KumarICAR-National Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Disease Informatics (ICAR-NIVEDI), Yelahanka, Bengaluru - 560 064, Karnataka, India.
R ShomeDivision of Epidemiology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly - 243 122, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe present study aimed to study the seroprevalence of brucellosis in small ruminants of Gujarat state, India, using Rose Bengal Plate test (RBPT) and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA). MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 2444 sera samples (675 sheep and 1769 goat) from unorganized sector and 1310 sera samples (861 sheep and 449 goat) from seven organized farms were collected for brucellosis screening.

resultsIn unorganized sector, 23.70% sheep (160/675) and 15.99% goat (283/1769) were positive by RBPT and 24.44% sheep (165/675) and 17.24% goat (305/1769) by iELISA. The organized sector samples showed higher seroprevalence in goat (7.79 %, 35/449) than sheep (4.06 %, 35/861) by RBPT. Similarly, in iELISA, goat samples showed a higher seroprevalence (9.35%, 42/449) compared to sheep (7.50%, 65/861). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of RBPT with ELISA were 88.69% and 99.65%, respectively, and showed a significant difference (p≤0.0001). The Chi-square analysis revealed a significant difference in seroprevalence between sectors (p≤0.01) and species (p≤0.01).

conclusionThe seroprevalence of brucellosis in small ruminants of Gujarat was investigated and showed a higher prevalence of brucellosis and warrants the implementation of proper preventive measures.

Indexed as

brucellosisGujaratindirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assayRose Bengal Plate testseroprevalencesmall ruminants

Identifiers

PMID30250359
PMCPMC6141288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.